Re: [PATCH] Re: syntax change for \cresc

2010-04-28 Thread Xavier Scheuer
2010/4/28 Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com: No, here you have a dynamic marking and some text markup, which do not have anything to do with each other, so they are positioned separately (examples are: pizz on the same note as a\p. You definitely don't want pp pizz.!) It won't

Re: [PATCH] Re: syntax change for \cresc

2010-04-28 Thread Graham Percival
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 09:35:02AM +0200, Xavier Scheuer wrote: But then I was informed of Graham's #(make-dynamic-extra ...) function, which I use now and which has no drawback at all (to what I know). – the dynamic is considered as a dynamic (in MIDI output too); – the dynamic is

Re: [PATCH] Re: syntax change for \cresc

2010-04-27 Thread Xavier Scheuer
2010/4/26 Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com: Absolutely. You can't imagine how long i fought to find proper ways to align pp and pp sempre properly with each other! How interesting! Do you use Graham's function or do you have something on your own? I hoped normal markups to align

Re: [PATCH] Re: syntax change for \cresc

2010-04-27 Thread Nick Payne
On 28/04/10 03:26, Xavier Scheuer wrote: [snip] I hoped normal markups to align automatically beside dynamics if presents, but John disagreed so I didn't open a discussion about that on one of the international mailing lists. c'4\mp-\markup \italic dolce to produce the quite usual mp dolce.

Re: [PATCH] Re: syntax change for \cresc

2010-04-27 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
Am Mittwoch, 28. April 2010 00:11:24 schrieb Nick Payne: On 28/04/10 03:26, Xavier Scheuer wrote: [snip] I hoped normal markups to align automatically beside dynamics if presents, but John disagreed so I didn't open a discussion about that on one of the international mailing lists.

Re: [PATCH] Re: syntax change for \cresc

2010-04-26 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
Am Sonntag, 25. April 2010 14:10:40 schrieben Sie: [Dreams\] It would be great to have a simpler, more user-friendly way to align text with dynamics. [\Dreams] Absolutely. You can't imagine how long i fought to find proper ways to align pp and pp sempre properly with each other! You know

Re: [PATCH] Re: syntax change for \cresc

2010-04-26 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 4/26/10 2:24 PM, Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com wrote: Am Sonntag, 25. April 2010 14:10:40 schrieben Sie: Should I say that it would be useful for many people to see this in the LSR and in the doc? Yes, I totally understand. However, the LSR is (still?) based on lilypond

Re: [PATCH] Re: syntax change for \cresc

2010-04-25 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
Am Samstag, 24. April 2010 11:50:20 schrieben Sie: Hi Reinhold, Graham, 2010/4/23 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca: As far as I'm concerned, yes. Maybe wait 24 hours in case anybody objects? But then go ahead. For anybody skimming this: the patch includes a convert-ly rule

Re: [PATCH] Re: syntax change for \cresc

2010-04-25 Thread Xavier Scheuer
Thanks for this very useful reply. 2010/4/25 Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com: [...] You can continue using that definition, of course. However, your approach has the problem(s) that (1) it only creates something that looks like a crescendo, but lilypond does not know this

Re: [PATCH] Re: syntax change for \cresc

2010-04-24 Thread Xavier Scheuer
Hi Reinhold, Graham, 2010/4/23 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca: As far as I'm concerned, yes.  Maybe wait 24 hours in case anybody objects?  But then go ahead. For anybody skimming this: the patch includes a convert-ly rule which changes any current \cresc into \deprecatedcresc, so