On 12/2/09 2:47 AM, Valentin Villenave v.villen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Mats Bengtsson mats.bengts...@ee.kth.se
wrote:
Running the command grep format-mark- scm/translation-functions.scm in
Linux gives the following list of functions:
(define-public
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
Doing this right probably means a careful explanation of a few of these in
the NR, and an appendix showing all of the possibilities.
I was about to suggest something like that, but aren't appendices
automatically generated?
Why not simply extend the current example so that it shows all the
possibilities? No need to explain in words, especially since the names
are more or less self-explanatory.
/Mats
Valentin Villenave wrote:
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
Doing
On 12/2/09 1:40 PM, Mats Bengtsson mats.bengts...@ee.kth.se wrote:
Why not simply extend the current example so that it shows all the
possibilities? No need to explain in words, especially since the names
are more or less self-explanatory.
Because it's too many things to list in the body
Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 12/2/09 1:40 PM, Mats Bengtsson mats.bengts...@ee.kth.se wrote:
Why not simply extend the current example so that it shows all the
possibilities? No need to explain in words, especially since the names
are more or less self-explanatory.
Because it's too many
On 12/2/09 2:58 PM, Mats Bengtsson mats.bengts...@ee.kth.se wrote:
Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 12/2/09 1:40 PM, Mats Bengtsson mats.bengts...@ee.kth.se wrote:
Why not simply extend the current example so that it shows all the
possibilities? No need to explain in words, especially since
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 03:41:06PM -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 12/2/09 2:58 PM, Mats Bengtsson mats.bengts...@ee.kth.se wrote:
Because it's too many things to list in the body of the NR. We try to keep
the body of the NR as short as feasible, and put exhaustive lists in the
