On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 11:18:51PM +0100, Vally an Leon wrote:
Stop that nonsense!
Complaining about every single worm mail that's distributed on the
mailing list isn't really helpfull. Indeed, it doubles the amount of
useless mails.
For that worm problem: IMHO, the list owners should ASAP
a)
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 11:18:51PM +0100, Vally an Leon wrote:
Stop that nonsense!
Complaining about every single worm mail that's distributed on the
mailing list isn't really helpfull. Indeed, it doubles the
Op zo 29-02-2004, om 15:36 schreef Nick Busigin:
a) make the list closed post (only subscribed members may post to the list),
b) if that worms come from a subscribed member, kick that member,
c) reject every mail containing attachments other than .ly or .png.
IMO only option C) is
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 09:36:58AM -0500, Nick Busigin wrote:
a) make the list closed post (only subscribed members may post to the list),
b) if that worms come from a subscribed member, kick that member,
c) reject every mail containing attachments other than .ly or .png.
IMO only
[Mark Van den Borre]
[...] making posting members-only isn't really newcomer-friendly. That
effect is often underestimated!
The current amount of SPAM on the Lilypond list sometimes make me ponder
with the idea of unsubscribing. We have to be friendly to old-timers
too, not only newcomers :-)
François Pinard writes:
The current amount of SPAM on the Lilypond list sometimes make me ponder
with the idea of unsubscribing.
No, please don't! ;-)
Note that the recent mail bombing was the cause of a worm, not spam.
The worm is using user addresses from subscribers; subcriber-only
posts
HN=Han-Wen Nienhuys
NB=Nick Busigin
MK=Matthias Kilian
MK For that worm problem: IMHO, the list owners should ASAP
MK
MK a) make the list closed post (only subscribed members may post to the list),
MK b) if that worms come from a subscribed member, kick that member,
MK c) reject every mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* At least in *my* mind, mailing list manager does not mean mailing
list owner. I just (try to) implement, within the bounds of the tech
available, what Han-wen and Jan think should happen. Thus, when Han-wen
speaks here, an owner is speaking.
I think this whole
