+1. I've *never* seen an ambitus except at the very beginning of a piece.
I often use an ambitus in front- or end-matter, to give vocal ranges separate from the score itself. Of
course, "front-matter" can be interpreted as "the very beginning of a piece", but I think
of it as entirely
Am Do., 1. Nov. 2018 um 16:24 Uhr schrieb Kieren MacMillan
:
>
> Hi Werner,
>
> > +1. I've *never* seen an ambitus except at the very beginning of a piece.
>
> I often use an ambitus in front- or end-matter, to give vocal ranges separate
> from the score itself. Of course, "front-matter" can be
Hi Werner,
> +1. I've *never* seen an ambitus except at the very beginning of a piece.
I often use an ambitus in front- or end-matter, to give vocal ranges separate
from the score itself. Of course, "front-matter" can be interpreted as "the
very beginning of a piece", but I think of it as
> So, to be honest, I'm not sure whether trying to make the
> Ambitus_engraver compatible with hiding empty staves would be worth
> the effort, especially if (as you say) that effort would be large.
+1. I've *never* seen an ambitus except at the very beginning of a
piece.
Werner
Hi Lukas,
> It seems to me that the whole point (or, at least, the most important
> application) of the Ambitus indication is to enable users of the score to
> judge the tessitura "at first glance" (even though, of course, for a reliable
> judgement one would have to look at the actual music
Where would you expect the Ambitus marker to show up if you do not
want the staff to appear in the first system?
First entry? I am not sure that the interfaces the Ambitus_engraver
exercises would allow to make that difference, but if they did, this
would be a reasonable expectation. Though
Lukas-Fabian Moser writes:
> Am 01.11.18 um 01:34 schrieb Rohan Srinivasan:
>> Thank you - I meant to reply to the list. I have the following:
>
> The problem is the Ambitus_engraver. The ambitus is given at the
> beginning of the piece, and if you do this, the first staff of the
> singing voice
Am 01.11.18 um 01:34 schrieb Rohan Srinivasan:
Thank you - I meant to reply to the list. I have the following:
The problem is the Ambitus_engraver. The ambitus is given at the
beginning of the piece, and if you do this, the first staff of the
singing voice is not empty (but contains the
Thank you - I meant to reply to the list. I have the following:
\version "2.19.82"
\header {
title = "CLOUDS AND SUNSHINE"
subtitle = "or, I'VE JUST ARRIVED FROM DIXIE"
composer = "George H. Coes (1828?-1897)"
}
\paper {
#(set-paper-size "a4")
}
\layout {
\context {
\Voice
Have also used the \override VerticalAxisGroup.remove-first = ##t and can
confirm this works with 2.18.2 when added to score block.
\score {
<<
\flutePart
\pianoPart
>>
\layout { #(layout-set-staff-size 22)
\context { \Staff \RemoveEmptyStaves
(Replying to list, assuming you wrote to me personally only by accident,
as implied by your wording):
Am 31.10.18 um 00:42 schrieb Rohan Srinivasan:
Could any of you give me an example of how \RemoveAllEmptyStaves is
used? I have:
\layout {
\context {
\Staff
\RemoveAllEmptyStaves
Am 29.10.18 um 05:52 schrieb Lukas-Fabian Moser:
I am currently engraving a song for soprano and piano which begins
with 15 measures of piano solo. I would like the soprano's staff not
to show since it is not playing. \RemoveEmptyStaves does not seem to
hide the first line of the piece.
I am currently engraving a song for soprano and piano which begins
with 15 measures of piano solo. I would like the soprano's staff not
to show since it is not playing. \RemoveEmptyStaves does not seem to
hide the first line of the piece.
In current versions (there's no reason not to use
Dear list,
I am currently engraving a song for soprano and piano which begins with 15
measures of piano solo. I would like the soprano's staff not to show since
it is not playing. \RemoveEmptyStaves does not seem to hide the first line
of the piece.
Rohan
14 matches
Mail list logo