Re: 2 questions concerning skips and dynamics

2005-12-16 Thread Thomas Ruedas
On Thursday 15 December 2005 10:50, Mats Bengtsson wrote: > The misplaced text version crescendo is just one of several > indications that the template is a quick hack that would need > polishing or an complete redesign to work fully. It's really > strange that nobody has taken the time to revise i

Re: 2 questions concerning skips and dynamics

2005-12-15 Thread Mats Bengtsson
I would recommend you to first typeset your dynamics in a normal stave attached to normal notes and make sure that you understand exactly how they are positioned relative to the notes. Then, you can simply replace the notes by skips and use them in the Dynamics context instead. A good starting poi

Re: 2 questions concerning skips and dynamics

2005-12-14 Thread Thomas Ruedas
On Wednesday 14 December 2005 12:47, Mats Bengtsson wrote: > The duration of the skips is handled exactly as the duration of > ordinary notes. If you insert some bar checks, you will see that > the durations are probably not what you want: Ok, thanks for confirming that. > Since the last duration s

Re: 2 questions concerning skips and dynamics

2005-12-14 Thread Mats Bengtsson
The duration of the skips is handled exactly as the duration of ordinary notes. If you insert some bar checks, you will see that the durations are probably not what you want: dynamics = { s\mf s4. | \setTextCresc s\< | s2 | s4\f s\> s4\! } Since the last duration specified above the dynamics is

2 questions concerning skips and dynamics

2005-12-13 Thread Thomas Ruedas
Hi, I came back to my attempts with the staff-centered dynamics in a piano score, and while the example I was pointed to in an earlier thread essentially works, I am still confused about two issues which I don't understand from the docs either. A test example (v.2.6.3) is at the bottom. - How d