It seems that if I write:
\override Staff.TimeSignature #'stencil = ##f
... there's no problem. But this:
\override Staff.TimeSignature #'stencil = ##t
... produces:
warning: type check for `stencil' failed; value `#t' must be of type `stencil'
I assumed the opposite of #f would be #t.
Am 04.04.2013 16:27, schrieb James Harkins:
It seems that if I write:
\override Staff.TimeSignature #'stencil = ##f
... there's no problem. But this:
\override Staff.TimeSignature #'stencil = ##t
... produces:
warning: type check for `stencil' failed; value `#t' must be of type
James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com writes:
It seems that if I write:
\override Staff.TimeSignature #'stencil = ##f
... there's no problem. But this:
\override Staff.TimeSignature #'stencil = ##t
... produces:
warning: type check for `stencil' failed; value `#t' must be of type
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com writes:
It seems that if I write:
\override Staff.TimeSignature #'stencil = ##f
... there's no problem. But this:
\override Staff.TimeSignature #'stencil = ##t
... produces:
warning: type check for `stencil'
