Re: 2.16.0 Open string fingering marks have _ and ^ behave as ^

2012-11-09 Thread Olivier Biot
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 2:35 AM, Thomas Morley wrote: > Hi again, > > I stumbled across > http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=631 > > { > > } > > works. > Thanks again Thomas, I completely forgot about the chord trick for articulations. Best regards, Olivier ___

Re: 2.16.0 Open string fingering marks have _ and ^ behave as ^

2012-11-08 Thread Thomas Morley
2012/11/7 Olivier Biot : > On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 12:01 AM, Thomas Morley > wrote: >> 2012/11/5 Olivier Biot : >>> Dear all, >>> >>> I think I just found a Lilypond bug. >>> >>> The following snippet with fingerings does only show one "open string" >>> fingering while TWO have been written. The or

Re: 2.16.0 Open string fingering marks have _ and ^ behave as ^

2012-11-06 Thread Olivier Biot
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 12:01 AM, Thomas Morley wrote: > 2012/11/5 Olivier Biot : >> Dear all, >> >> I think I just found a Lilypond bug. >> >> The following snippet with fingerings does only show one "open string" >> fingering while TWO have been written. The order of _ and ^ play no >> role in th

Re: 2.16.0 Open string fingering marks have _ and ^ behave as ^

2012-11-05 Thread Thomas Morley
2012/11/5 Olivier Biot : > Dear all, > > I think I just found a Lilypond bug. > > The following snippet with fingerings does only show one "open string" > fingering while TWO have been written. The order of _ and ^ play no > role in this bug. > > Expected behavior: both "\open" fingerings are displ

2.16.0 Open string fingering marks have _ and ^ behave as ^

2012-11-05 Thread Olivier Biot
Dear all, I think I just found a Lilypond bug. The following snippet with fingerings does only show one "open string" fingering while TWO have been written. The order of _ and ^ play no role in this bug. Expected behavior: both "\open" fingerings are displayed, one above and one below selected n