those packages in the
mailist
archives. Advertising 2.5.9 under fink unstable is misleading.
(besides, the experimental packages are up to 2.5.11, not .9 :)
Cheers,
- Graham
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org
Hello, all!
Finally back (after a long hiatus from beyond-the-Pond), and fink
updated my unstable install. But the version now listed is 2.5.0, not
2.5.9 as indicated on the website -- is that expected?
Thanks,
Kieren.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
See http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2005-02/msg00262.html
/Mats
Kieren Richard MacMillan wrote:
Hello, all!
Finally back (after a long hiatus from beyond-the-Pond), and fink
updated my unstable install. But the version now listed is 2.5.0, not
2.5.9 as indicated on the website
However, the web site _should_ say 2.5.0, not 2.5.9. I've fixed this.
Kieren, you may find the experimental CVS to be of interest, and bug
reports
about it would be great, but for production use definitely stay with
2.4.2.
- Graham
On 17-Feb-05, at 12:52 PM, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
See
