Am 05.11.2015 um 18:27 schrieb Matteo Ceccarello:
> On 04/11/2015 15:23, Mark Knoop wrote:
>>
>> You might consider using the pygit2 python module [1] rather than
>> calling calling git with subprocess. This could perhaps replace a
>> substantial part of your OpenLilyLibRepo class.
>>
>> [1]
Hi Matteo,
thank you for your renewed activity for openLilyLib.
Am 04.11.2015 um 14:59 schrieb Matteo Ceccarello:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I just implemented a small command line tool that I hope will simplify
> the use of OpenLilyLib [1] in multiple projects. You can find a
> motivating example
On 04/11/2015 15:23, Mark Knoop wrote:
You might consider using the pygit2 python module [1] rather than
calling calling git with subprocess. This could perhaps replace a
substantial part of your OpenLilyLibRepo class.
[1] http://www.pygit2.org/
Thank you for the pointer, I was not aware of
Am 04.11.2015 um 17:01 schrieb Simon Albrecht:
> On 04.11.2015 14:59, Matteo Ceccarello wrote:
>> Hello everybody,
>>
>> I just implemented a small command line tool that I hope will simplify
>> the use of OpenLilyLib [1] in multiple projects. You can find a
>> motivating example in a blog post
At 14:59 on 04 Nov 2015, Matteo Ceccarello wrote:
>I just implemented a small command line tool that I hope will simplify
>the use of OpenLilyLib [1] in multiple projects. You can find a
>motivating example in a blog post [2]. The tool itself, together with
>installation instructions and a small
Hello everybody,
I just implemented a small command line tool that I hope will simplify
the use of OpenLilyLib [1] in multiple projects. You can find a
motivating example in a blog post [2]. The tool itself, together with
installation instructions and a small tutorial can be found on Github
On 04.11.2015 14:59, Matteo Ceccarello wrote:
Hello everybody,
I just implemented a small command line tool that I hope will simplify
the use of OpenLilyLib [1] in multiple projects. You can find a
motivating example in a blog post [2]. The tool itself, together with
installation
