Hi,
please have a look at the code below.
It is an attempt to implement an aligning spanner between certain
marks at score-level.
Here I use TextMark and a newly defined TextMarkSpanner-grob.
Currently the TextNarks are moved, which is nice. Though, it relies on
the highest element in the Staff,
thanks joram, they're excellent references!
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Dear Rohan,
> is there a reference sheet for these properties somewhere that i
> should consult in future before writing the list?
I would recommend to read the learning manual. For questions like yours,
these pages could have helped you:
hello edward (& list),
> \override Score.RehearsalMark.padding = #5
that works perfectly! many thanks.
for the archives, this pushes the marks that would be placed within #n
(which can be fractional and is in line spaces) to lie at #n, but
leaves marks that lie beyond #n in place
is there a
That's funny, I have no idea. It only seems to give the error with a
\mark at the beginning of the score.
Best,
Edward
--
Dr. Edward Neeman
Adjunct Instructor, South Georgia State College
Collaborative Pianist, Valdosta State University, Georgia
Artist Faculty, ELMS Conservatory,
On 12/4/2017 9:23 AM, Edward Neeman wrote:
Here's an alternative solution that puts the marks in their own
dynamic context, keeping them vertically aligned:
\version "2.18.2"
<<
\new Dynamics \with { \consists Mark_engraver } {
\mark \markup \rounded-box "x" s1
\mark \markup \rounded-box
Here's an alternative solution that puts the marks in their own
dynamic context, keeping them vertically aligned:
\version "2.18.2"
<<
\new Dynamics \with { \consists Mark_engraver } {
\mark \markup \rounded-box "x" s1
\mark \markup \rounded-box "x" s1
\mark \markup \rounded-box "x" s1
I'm guessing that staff-padding doesn't work because the Mark_engraver
is part of the Score context, not the Staff context. What about this?
\version "2.18.2"
\relative c'' {
\override Score.RehearsalMark.padding = #5
\mark \markup \rounded-box "x" c1
\mark \markup \rounded-box "x" g'1
pps. thanks so much for lilypond! it's very very excellent!
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
ps. actually, two more things
1. looking at the whole score, perhaps what i really would like is a way to
stop the marks near the staff moving around, perhaps by setting a minimum
distance they can approach, while allowing very distant marks to still
float, ie. the last mark in
\version "2.18.2"
hello again
someone mentioned off-list that i should send a minimal example, apologies
so:
\version "2.18.2"
\relative c'' {
\mark \markup \rounded-box "x" c1
\mark \markup \rounded-box "x" g'1
\mark \markup \rounded-box "x" a,1
}
the three boxes are all at different heights
i'm hoping
hello list
hopefully a very simple question
i've a score with timing indications given as text marks above the top staff
there's a tiny extract attached as a png
from reading the manual i had hped that setting
\override RehearsalMark.outside-staff-padding = #n
for some value of n would align
\override Score.RehearsalMark.self-alignment-X = #LEFT
Cheers,
Jean
Le lundi 27 novembre 2017 à 11:18 +0100, N. Andrew Walsh a écrit :
> Hi List,
>
> I have a piece where I would like to have section titles, like:
>
> I. Risoluto
> II. Libero
> III. Giocoso
> etc.
>
> I've been using \mark to
On 27.11.2017 11:18, N. Andrew Walsh wrote:
I've been using \mark to insert these into the score, but that aligns
the text centered on the barline, thus with a significant portion of
the text lying over the preceding measure. I'd like them instead to be
left-aligned to the barline, so that
Hi List,
I have a piece where I would like to have section titles, like:
I. Risoluto
II. Libero
III. Giocoso
etc.
I've been using \mark to insert these into the score, but that aligns the
text centered on the barline, thus with a significant portion of the text
lying over the preceding measure.
15 matches
Mail list logo
