Francisco Vila writes:
> Or zeroline.ly , not true ordinary word but a likely filename.
> Some filenames make gs crash; expect bug reports on this sooner or later.
> A pity tiger.ly does not work
$ rm -f align.ps
$ touch align.ps
$ ps2pdf align.ps
$ gs align.ps # looks fine
$ evince
Francisco Vila writes:
> Or zeroline.ly , not true ordinary word but a likely filename.
> Some filenames make gs crash; expect bug reports on this sooner or later.
> A pity tiger.ly does not work
I was actually looking for the tiger, but it seems that it is no longer
being distributed.
--
Davi
2013/11/2 David Kastrup :
> Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
>
>> David Kastrup writes:
>>
>>> No, the PostScript is still fine. But when you ask Ghostscript to
>>> convert it to anything else, it has its own idea what to convert.
>>
>> Nice. How did you come by this one?
>
> Accidentally. The weird t
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> David Kastrup writes:
>
>> No, the PostScript is still fine. But when you ask Ghostscript to
>> convert it to anything else, it has its own idea what to convert.
>
> Nice. How did you come by this one?
Accidentally. The weird thing is that I then tried using the fi
For me, it does not occur with 2.17 versions (.9 and .26) but only with
2.16.2.
Cheers,
Joram
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
David Kastrup writes:
> No, the PostScript is still fine. But when you ask Ghostscript to
> convert it to anything else, it has its own idea what to convert.
Nice. How did you come by this one?
Greetings, Jan
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofS
On 11/01/2013 09:32 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
No, the PostScript is still fine. But when you ask Ghostscript to
convert it to anything else, it has its own idea what to convert.
Ok!
At first I thought it was an easter egg, but so close to Halloween it
must be a bug!
Best
Peter
___
Peter Bjuhr writes:
> On 11/01/2013 09:01 PM, Peter Bjuhr wrote:
>>
>> On 11/01/2013 08:52 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>>
>>> Only by analogy. LilyPond is not at fault for _this_ one.
>>>
>> Ok, I see. Always fun with a little game! :-)
>>
> I guess it must be related to the creation of the postsc
On 11/01/2013 09:01 PM, Peter Bjuhr wrote:
On 11/01/2013 08:52 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
Only by analogy. LilyPond is not at fault for _this_ one.
Ok, I see. Always fun with a little game! :-)
I guess it must be related to the creation of the postscript...(?)
Best
Peter
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 3:52 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Peter Bjuhr writes:
>
> > On 11/01/2013 07:53 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> >> Can you guess what the output of saving and running the following file
> >> will be?
> >>
> > Is the surprising output related to this?
> >> If an included file is g
On 11/01/2013 08:52 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
Only by analogy. LilyPond is not at fault for _this_ one.
Ok, I see. Always fun with a little game! :-)
Best
Peter
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/lis
Peter Bjuhr writes:
> On 11/01/2013 07:53 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Can you guess what the output of saving and running the following file
>> will be?
>>
> Is the surprising output related to this?
>> If an included file is given a name which is the same as one in
>> LilyPond's installation fil
On 11/01/2013 07:53 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
Can you guess what the output of saving and running the following file
will be?
Is the surprising output related to this?
If an included file is given a name which is the same as one in
LilyPond's installation files, LilyPond's file from the instal
Can you guess what the output of saving and running the following file
will be?
\markup \center-align { hoi hoo }
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
14 matches
Mail list logo
