Rutger Hofman cs.vu.nl> writes:
>
> Hello list,
>
> the auto-beaming I get with a (8. 16 8) figure is fine for e.g. 6/8
> time, but if it is within a tuplet, the second beam at the 16/th extends
> to the wrong side. See attached .png and its .ly source.
>
> Can you please point me how I can
On 29 December 2011 16:23, Graham Percival wrote:
>
> Yes.
Thank you Graham for this raisoned and well-arhued answer.
Rutger, have a look at what 2 lead developers have recently said about
using development version:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-12/msg00503.html
http://lis
Graham Percival writes:
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 04:18:04PM +0100, Rutger Hofman wrote:
>> >This is fixed in the latest development version.
>>
>> Is it strongly disadvised to upgrade to that for 'stable' usage?
>
> Yes.
The current version is an improvement in a number of ways, but you are,
f
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 04:18:04PM +0100, Rutger Hofman wrote:
> >This is fixed in the latest development version.
>
> Is it strongly disadvised to upgrade to that for 'stable' usage?
Yes.
Cheers,
- Graham
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@
On 12/29/2011 03:18 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Rutger Hofman"
To:
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 2:12 PM
Subject: Auto-beaming in tuplets?
Hello list,
the auto-beaming I get with a (8. 16 8) figure is fine for e.g. 6/8
time, but if it is withi
- Original Message -
From: "Rutger Hofman"
To:
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 2:12 PM
Subject: Auto-beaming in tuplets?
Hello list,
the auto-beaming I get with a (8. 16 8) figure is fine for e.g. 6/8
time, but if it is within a tuplet, the second beam at the 16/th e
Hello list,
the auto-beaming I get with a (8. 16 8) figure is fine for e.g. 6/8
time, but if it is within a tuplet, the second beam at the 16/th extends
to the wrong side. See attached .png and its .ly source.
Can you please point me how I can fix this, e.g. with an autobeaming
rule/exceptio
