Janek,
Thanks. The notation for full-bar rests isn't as intuitive as I thought!
Best regards,
Peter
mailto:lilyp...@ptoye.com
www.ptoye.com
-
Monday, April 15, 2013, 11:22:15 AM, you wrote:
> You need to specify duration for the rest. When there's no initial
> duration
t the following behavior qualifies for an issue
> report:
thanks all!
tracker
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3316&thanks=3316&ts=1366029794
has been added
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Barcheck-problems-in-ext
Janek Warchoł writes:
> You need to specify duration for the rest. When there's no initial
> duration, LilyPond assumes a quarter, and that conflicts with the
> barcheck.
But I do think that the following behavior qualifies for an issue
report:
>> Interpreting music...
>> D:/Peter/Music/Lilypo
uot;1" if you
don't specify otherwise.
HTH
Urs
Am 15.04.2013 12:13, schrieb Peter Toye:
Barcheck problems in extremely simple file Another newbie alert!
I'm getting barcheck problems when putting in full bar rests and can't
work out why. The file's very simple:
\version
You need to specify duration for the rest. When there's no initial
duration, LilyPond assumes a quarter, and that conflicts with the
barcheck.
hth,
Janek
2013/4/15 Peter Toye :
> Another newbie alert!
>
> I'm getting barcheck problems when putting in full bar rests and can't work
> out why. The
Another newbie alert!
I'm getting barcheck problems when putting in full bar rests and can't work out
why. The file's very simple:
\version "2.16.2" % necessary for upgrading to future LilyPond versions.
\language "english"
<<
\new Staff
{ \clef "treble" \key f \minor \time 4/4 \relative
