On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Thomas Morley
wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> 2016-08-02 19:13 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley :
> > 2016-08-02 17:13 GMT+02:00 Andrew Bernard :
> >> Hi Harm,
> >>
> >> Thank you for this. I suppose I was not clear enough, as usual. I
> >> explicitly need the beams on the individu
Harm:
This [code, and indeed entire thread] is just awesome.
I will probably never use what’s here… but I’m just so happy that it exists,
and that people like you exist.
Thanks!
K.
On Aug 3, 2016, at 9:16 AM, Thomas Morley wrote:
> My previous code aimed at setting the beam-segments directly.
Hi Andrew,
2016-08-02 19:13 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley :
> 2016-08-02 17:13 GMT+02:00 Andrew Bernard :
>> Hi Harm,
>>
>> Thank you for this. I suppose I was not clear enough, as usual. I
>> explicitly need the beams on the individual note to have a longer
>> beamlet on the top, with the rest being sh
2016-08-02 17:13 GMT+02:00 Andrew Bernard :
> Hi Harm,
>
> Thank you for this. I suppose I was not clear enough, as usual. I
> explicitly need the beams on the individual note to have a longer
> beamlet on the top, with the rest being shorter. This is what I am
> unable to achieve. So it's not the
Hi Harm,
Thank you for this. I suppose I was not clear enough, as usual. I
explicitly need the beams on the individual note to have a longer
beamlet on the top, with the rest being shorter. This is what I am
unable to achieve. So it's not the beam break that I can't do, rather,
it is the adjustmen
2016-08-02 15:53 GMT+02:00 Andrew Bernard :
> Hello All,
>
> How would one achieve a beam with a break in it, as per the attached score
> extract?
>
> I know how to do the left hand side beaming in the image, but not the right
> hand side. Is this even possible, or do you have to blank it out with
Hello All,
How would one achieve a beam with a break in it, as per the attached score
extract?
I know how to do the left hand side beaming in the image, but not the right
hand side. Is this even possible, or do you have to blank it out with a
white box (ugly)?
This is not a mistake - it is a New
