Re: Beams and staff line thickness

Thank you Harm for the information. I'm glad it is (will be) fixed. I should have found it myself. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Beams and staff line thickness

2018-04-02 21:35 GMT+02:00 Noeck : > Hi, > > when playing with staff line thicknesses, I encountered the following > problem: > > \relative { > \override Staff.StaffSymbol.thickness = #4 > c''8 g a a > } > > In general, I thought Lilypond scales a lot of thicknesses and

Re: Beams and staff line thickness

Hi Kieren, thanks for the link. But isn’t that the opposite question? Here I would have thought that the horizontal positioning of the beam must account for the stem thickness. Obviously, the stems scale with the staff line thickness. But that’s not the point. My question was about the horizontal

Re: Beams and staff line thickness

Hi Noeck, > when playing with staff line thicknesses, I encountered the following > problem: > > \relative { > \override Staff.StaffSymbol.thickness = #4 > c''8 g a a > } > > In general, I thought Lilypond scales a lot of thicknesses and distances > according to staff lines and staff spaces.

Beams and staff line thickness

Hi, when playing with staff line thicknesses, I encountered the following problem: \relative { \override Staff.StaffSymbol.thickness = #4 c''8 g a a } In general, I thought Lilypond scales a lot of thicknesses and distances according to staff lines and staff spaces. But here the beams don’t