ad to do it; and while it's tedious to do
>that for every affected beam, it ensures that they look good and work
>properly.
>
>Cheers,
>
>A
>
>On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 11:08 AM Paul Hodges wrote:
>>The composer I'm working on is very fond of having beams ove
very affected beam, it ensures that they look good and work properly.
Cheers,
A
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 11:08 AM Paul Hodges wrote:
> The composer I'm working on is very fond of having beams over rests -
> and indeed it helps a lot in reading his more complex rhythms. However,
>
The composer I'm working on is very fond of having beams over rests -
and indeed it helps a lot in reading his more complex rhythms. However,
LilyPond is treating rests differently from notes, in that beam
positions are adjusted to suit the notes, whereas rests are then
adjusted to sui
Hi Carl,
Thank you so much for the reply, I will report this in the bugs subforum.
Also, thanks for the workaround, I will use it for the moment being.
Best,
Gilberto
--
Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html
On 1/23/20, 7:48 AM, "Gilberto Agostinho" wrote:
Hi everyone,
It seems that the beam concaveness value is ignored when beaming over rests,
in the case of a single note with a single rest. This happens with and
without stemlet. See the code and score below, the groups marke
Hi everyone,
It seems that the beam concaveness value is ignored when beaming over rests,
in the case of a single note with a single rest. This happens with and
without stemlet. See the code and score below, the groups marked with an
asterisk should have been flat (+inf.0 concaveness):
\version
Hi everyone,
It seems that the beam concaveness value is ignored when beaming over rests,
in the case of a single note with a single rest. This happens with and
without stemlet. See the code and score below, the groups marked with an
asterisk should have been flat (+inf.0 concaveness):
\version
Tobin Chodos writes:
> Is there no way to set beams to go over rests globally?
Not with reasonable amount of effort (you'd need to write a replacement
for the Auto_beam_engraver: the built-in one doesn't beam over rests).
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypo
Is there no way to set beams to go over rests globally?
Thanks again - new to this list but learning a lot.
Tobin
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
> - Original Message -
> From: Stefan Thomas
>
> I would like to have the beams longer and the should include the last rest
> of the four sixteenths group,
> Does someone have an idea for solving this problem?
> \version "2.14.2"
> \new Staff {
> \time 3/4
> r16 g' c' r r f' g' r c' r
hello,
On 28 December 2011 11:51, Stefan Thomas
wrote:
> Dear community,
> I have a problem with beams over rests.
> In the below quoted snippet, they don't look like expected.
> I would like to have the beams longer and the should include the last rest
> of the four sixt
11 11:51 AM
Subject: again: beams over rests
Dear community,
I have a problem with beams over rests.
In the below quoted snippet, they don't look like expected.
I would like to have the beams longer and the should include the last rest of
the four sixteenths group,
Does someone ha
Dear community,
I have a problem with beams over rests.
In the below quoted snippet, they don't look like expected.
I would like to have the beams longer and the should include the last rest
of the four sixteenths group,
Does someone have an idea for solving this problem?
\version "2.
Hi,
for me it works as expected on 2.15.2.
Strange...
Am 30.06.2011 03:42, schrieb Edward Neeman:
Hello,
In this example (taken from the Documentation page,
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/notation/beams ), the beam
doesn't extend over the rest on the right. How can I get it to
Hello.
On 30 Jun 2011, at 06:34, "Keith OHara" wrote:
> Colin Campbell shaw.ca> writes:
>
>> Consistently broken for me, with 2.12.3, 2.13.63 and 2.15.3 on Ubuntu
>> 11.04
>
> I made a bug-list entry
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1718
I think you meant
http://code.goo
On 30/06/11 11:42, Edward Neeman wrote:
Hello,
In this example (taken from the Documentation page,
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/notation/beams ), the beam
doesn't extend over the rest on the right. How can I get it to look
like it does in the documentation?
Thanks,
Edward
Colin Campbell shaw.ca> writes:
> Consistently broken for me, with 2.12.3, 2.13.63 and 2.15.3 on Ubuntu
> 11.04
I made a bug-list entry
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1718
Edward Neeman gmail.com> writes:
> If I set the Beam 'stemlet-length to a value greater than 0,
> th
On 11-06-29 08:48 PM, Keith OHara wrote:
Edward Neeman gmail.com> writes:
beam doesn't extend over the rest on the right. How can I get it to
look like it does in the documentation?
\version "2.14.1"
\relative c' { r4 r8[ g' a r] r g[ | a] r }
Uh oh. It works perfectly
Hi,
I'm using Lilypond 2.14.1 and MacOSX 10.5.8.
If I set the Beam 'stemlet-length to a value greater than 0, then
the beam looks like it should.
Thanks,
Edward
On 6/30/11 9:48 AM, Keith OHara wrote:
Edward Neeman gmail.com> writ
Hi Keith (and Edward),
> Could you, or anybody else who gets the bad output, post
> which Lilypond version and which operating system you use?
Doesn't work here… 2.15.1-1 on Mac OS X 10.6.7.
Cheers,
Kieren.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user
Edward Neeman gmail.com> writes:
> beam doesn't extend over the rest on the right. How can I get it to
> look like it does in the documentation?
> \version "2.14.1"
> \relative c' { r4 r8[ g' a r] r g[ | a] r }
Uh oh. It works perfectly for me with 2.14.0,
giving a beam exten
Hello,
In this example (taken from the Documentation page,
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/notation/beams ), the
beam doesn't extend over the rest on the right. How can I get it to
look like it does in the documentation?
Thanks,
Edward
I'm writing a piece with complex rhythms and want to beam rests together with
notes for clarity.
c8[ r8] produces a beam on the c which does not extend to the following rest.
c8[ \set stemLeftBeamCount = #1r8] produces what I'm after in that case...
but in any case manually beaming every beat
I'm writing a piece with complex rhythms and want to beam rests together with
notes for clarity.
c8[ r8] produces a beam on the c which does not extend to the following rest.
c8[ \set stemLeftBeamCount = #1r8] produces what I'm after in that case...
but in any case manually beaming every beat
Stefan Thomas wrote:
> it would be great if one could switch on the beams over
> rests automatically.
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> This would require a rewrite of the AutoBeaming code
> ...Maybe I can take a stab at it over the Christmas holiday.
Carl,
That would be awe
ossibilitie to do this fully automatically. I know that
> there is a possibilitie to do this in Finale and Sibelius. Beams over rest can
> be very useful in rhythmic complex contermporary music and it would be great
> if one could switch on the beams over rests automatically. Can be done
>
Sibelius. Beams
over rest can be very useful in rhythmic complex contermporary music and it
would be great if one could switch on the beams over rests automatically.
Can be done something like this with a sheme-script?
2008/12/7 Mark Polesky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Stefan,
>
> see http:
Stefan,
see http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2008-11/msg00213.html
- Mark
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
to
start and where to stop:
\relative { r 8 [ c 8 r 8 r 16 d r 16 e 8. r 8 d ] }
hdh
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/automatic-beams-over-rests-tp20881793p20881959.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list arc
Dear lilypond-users,
I have a question: is it possible, to get the beams in the below quoted
example automatically?
\relative { r8 [ c 8] r8 [ r16 d] r16 [ e8. ] r8 [ d] }
Thanks,
Stefan
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.g
30 matches
Mail list logo
