Re: Better slashed graces

2016-12-20 Thread Gilberto Agostinho
f but rather some help to create a conditional for a specific case (grace notes without beam) which was giving me an error, and now that David has spotted the issue and sent me a solution it's all working fine for me. Take care! Gilberto -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038

Re: Better slashed graces

2016-12-19 Thread Andrew Bernard
Hi Gilberto, You may not be aware of my detailed work on slashed beams and slashed stems that I recently contributed to openlilylib. Theres a function that provides fine control over the parameters of beam slashes, and which works on the left as well as the right (needed for many contemporary sco

Re: Better slashed graces

2016-12-19 Thread David Nalesnik
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Gilberto Agostinho wrote: > Hi David, > > > David Nalesnik wrote >>> I think the function needs >>> something like "if there is a beam, then add a slash, else if no beam >>> then >>> no slash". Do you think you could give me a hand with that? >> >> Sure, that's no

Re: Better slashed graces

2016-12-19 Thread Gilberto Agostinho
ction: acciaccaturas_and_slashed_notes.ly <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n198198/acciaccaturas_and_slashed_notes.ly> Take care! Gilberto -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Better-slashed-graces-tp184292p198198.html

Re: Better slashed graces

2016-12-19 Thread David Nalesnik
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Gilberto Agostinho wrote: > Hi David, > > First of all, thanks for your reply and for your help! > > > David Nalesnik wrote >> The problem is that there is no Beam grob, so an error is raised when >> you query its properties. > > I see! > > >> Following is a simple

Re: Better slashed graces

2016-12-19 Thread Gilberto Agostinho
o -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Better-slashed-graces-tp184292p198193.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Better slashed graces

2016-12-19 Thread David Nalesnik
Hi Gilberto, On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 6:43 AM, Gilberto Agostinho wrote: > Hi all, > > I just discovered a bug with my function above. It turns out the function > works well when there are two of more notes inside the \slashedGrace{}, but > when a single note is there the file does not compile. I

Re: Better slashed graces

2016-12-19 Thread Gilberto Agostinho
eally know how to implement it, would anyone be able to give me a hand? Example of a problematic case: slash-bug.ly <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n198182/slash-bug.ly> Thanks a lot, Gilberto -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Better-sla

Re: Better slashed graces

2015-12-02 Thread Peter Bjuhr
On 2015-11-30 18:01, tisimst wrote: I know that beamed grace notes don't /need/ a slash, so maybe there could be a hook to turn it on or off? There already is \slashedGrace. But it doesn't work for multiple notes. Best Peter ___ lilypond-user ma

Re: Better slashed graces

2015-11-30 Thread Gilberto Agostinho
he slash crosses only the very corner of the beams, so it's easy for it to look consistent regardless of other variables. See: <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n184309/sib_grace.png> -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Better-slashed-gra

Re: Better slashed graces

2015-11-30 Thread David Nalesnik
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 12:08 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: > > > You could have the idea of proportionality, but relative to the width of > the beam, so the line would always cross dead-center or a fixed distance > Well, not "fixed" if proportional... ___

Re: Better slashed graces

2015-11-30 Thread David Nalesnik
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Gilberto Agostinho < gilbertohasn...@gmail.com> wrote: > David Nalesnik-2 wrote > > My question would be: what is 'stem-fraction' now? What does it now > > measure? > > I have absolutely no idea, I just messed around with the variables and > expressions until I g

Re: Better slashed graces

2015-11-30 Thread Gilberto Agostinho
y this all could be automatized, so that those three arguments can actually become three parameters in the function. -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Better-slashed-graces-tp184292p184302.html Sent from the User mailing list archi

Re: Better slashed graces

2015-11-30 Thread David Nalesnik
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Gilberto Agostinho < gilbertohasn...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi David, > > As I wrote, I simply tried using some basic programming skills and trial > and > error in order to get a better looking results, and I would need some help > to make this function look decently

Re: Better slashed graces

2015-11-30 Thread David Nalesnik
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:01 AM, tisimst wrote: > > Devs, > > Any reason this can't be incorporated into the regular distribution? I > know that beamed grace notes don't *need* a slash, so maybe there could > be a hook to turn it on or off? > > I remember an email--I believe it was from Neil Putt

Re: Better slashed graces

2015-11-30 Thread Gilberto Agostinho
with the angle of the beam, so that all of these slashes look more uniform -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Better-slashed-graces-tp184292p184300.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lil

Re: Better slashed graces

2015-11-30 Thread David Nalesnik
Hi again, On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 10:44 AM, David Nalesnik wrote: > Hi Gilberto, > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Gilberto Agostinho < > gilbertohasn...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I am trying to improve the slashed grace function because currently it >> does >> work only for a lim

Re: Better slashed graces

2015-11-30 Thread Gilberto Agostinho
y Boulez, Stockhausen, Ferneyhough, Cage and others). Cheers, Gilberto -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Better-slashed-graces-tp184292p184296.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilyp

Re: Better slashed graces

2015-11-30 Thread tisimst
art of the regular distribution. > I believe it's in response to this snippet in the LSR: http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=721 (Slashed beamed grace notes) Gilberto, I think this is a VERY nice improvement! Great work! Devs, Any reason this can't be incorporated into the regula

Re: Better slashed graces

2015-11-30 Thread David Nalesnik
Hi Gilberto, On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Gilberto Agostinho < gilbertohasn...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I am trying to improve the slashed grace function because currently it does > work only for a limited amount of examples. I am trying to make the slash > always at the same position

Better slashed graces

2015-11-30 Thread Gilberto Agostinho
d.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Better-slashed-graces-tp184292.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user