Re: Box Notation

Dear Mr. MacMillan, To start with, thank you very much for your kind, helpful, and immediate reply. It has taken me a while to respond because I was initially daunted by the whole process of obtaining the package. I kept running into difficulties, probably due to my relative ineptitude with comput

Re: Box Notation

Hi Rowan, > I am a new LilyPond user. Welcome! > What I need is an unfilled box that will surround some portion of music, and > also a horizontal line extending from the right side of the box. Hope that helps! Kieren. __

Box Notation

Dear LilyPond Community, I am a new LilyPond user. So far I have been quite pleased with the program. I was trying to find box notation in the documentation, but failed to do so. What I need is an unfilled box that will surround some portion of music, and also a horizontal line extending from the

Re: Lutoslawski-style box notation

Hello Gents, It's GPL 3. Where is the problem? Andrew ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Lutoslawski-style box notation

On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 6:09 AM Thomas Morley wrote: > > Am So., 4. Nov. 2018 um 01:30 Uhr schrieb David Nalesnik > : > > > > On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 7:24 PM David Nalesnik > > wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 7:23 PM Andrew Bernard > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi David, > > > > > > > >

Re: Lutoslawski-style box notation

Am So., 4. Nov. 2018 um 01:30 Uhr schrieb David Nalesnik : > > On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 7:24 PM David Nalesnik > wrote: > > > > On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 7:23 PM Andrew Bernard > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi David, > > > > > > Isn't Lilypond open source? Cant you make your code open source? I am not > >

Re: Lutoslawski-style box notation

At 19:28 on 03 Nov 2018, David Nalesnik wrote: >Oops, sorry about the empty response. > >Sure, yes, I just want to make sure that I release it under the right >license (I suppose it must be GPLed) and include whatever I must >relative to LilyPond coverage by the GPL . I just jumped the gun, >that'

Re: Lutoslawski-style box notation

On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 7:24 PM David Nalesnik wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 7:23 PM Andrew Bernard > wrote: > > > > Hi David, > > > > Isn't Lilypond open source? Cant you make your code open source? I am not > > following your idea. > > > > Andrew > > > > > >> > > >> And, no :( I removed i

Re: Lutoslawski-style box notation

Hi David, In the license directory where all the open source licenses are provided, lilypond is clearly using GPL 3. That's open source. If you follow that. I cant see the difficulty. Andrew ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://

Re: Lutoslawski-style box notation

On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 7:23 PM Andrew Bernard wrote: > > Hi David, > > Isn't Lilypond open source? Cant you make your code open source? I am not > following your idea. > > Andrew > > >> > >> And, no :( I removed it from GitHub, because I simply do not >> understand how I would license such a thi

Re: Lutoslawski-style box notation

Hi David, Isn't Lilypond open source? Cant you make your code open source? I am not following your idea. Andrew > > And, no :( I removed it from GitHub, because I simply do not > understand how I would license such a thing, give proper > acknowledgement to LilyPond. It quotes code from LilyPo

Re: Lutoslawski-style box notation

On 11/3/2018 5:11 PM, Thomas Morley wrote: Am Sa., 3. Nov. 2018 um 21:36 Uhr schrieb Ben : On 11/3/2018 4:25 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 3:21 PM Ben wrote: On 11/3/2018 4:16 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 2:57 PM Ben wrote: On 11/3/2018 2:54 PM, m...@

Re: Lutoslawski-style box notation

On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 4:28 PM David Nalesnik wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 4:11 PM Thomas Morley wrote: > > > > Am Sa., 3. Nov. 2018 um 21:36 Uhr schrieb Ben : > > > > > > On 11/3/2018 4:25 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 3:21 PM Ben wrote: > > > > > > On 11/3/2

Re: Lutoslawski-style box notation

On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 4:11 PM Thomas Morley wrote: > > Am Sa., 3. Nov. 2018 um 21:36 Uhr schrieb Ben : > > > > On 11/3/2018 4:25 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: > > > > On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 3:21 PM Ben wrote: > > > > On 11/3/2018 4:16 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: > > > > On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 2:57 PM

Re: Lutoslawski-style box notation

Am Sa., 3. Nov. 2018 um 21:36 Uhr schrieb Ben : > > On 11/3/2018 4:25 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 3:21 PM Ben wrote: > > On 11/3/2018 4:16 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 2:57 PM Ben wrote: > > On 11/3/2018 2:54 PM, m...@opus11.net wrote: > > Just won

Re: Lutoslawski-style box notation

On 11/3/2018 4:25 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 3:21 PM Ben wrote: On 11/3/2018 4:16 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 2:57 PM Ben wrote: On 11/3/2018 2:54 PM, m...@opus11.net wrote: Just wondered if anyone has a working solution to creating Lutoslawski-sty

Re: Lutoslawski-style box notation

On 11/3/2018 4:25 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 3:21 PM Ben wrote: On 11/3/2018 4:16 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 2:57 PM Ben wrote: On 11/3/2018 2:54 PM, m...@opus11.net wrote: Just wondered if anyone has a working solution to creating Lutoslawski-sty

Re: Lutoslawski-style box notation

On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 3:21 PM Ben wrote: > > On 11/3/2018 4:16 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 2:57 PM Ben wrote: > > On 11/3/2018 2:54 PM, m...@opus11.net wrote: > > Just wondered if anyone has a working solution to creating Lutoslawski-style > box repeats such as this one

Re: Lutoslawski-style box notation

On 11/3/2018 4:16 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 2:57 PM Ben wrote: On 11/3/2018 2:54 PM, m...@opus11.net wrote: Just wondered if anyone has a working solution to creating Lutoslawski-style box repeats such as this one: https://goo.gl/images/TYKdWt I couldn't find a complet

Re: Lutoslawski-style box notation

On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 2:57 PM Ben wrote: > > On 11/3/2018 2:54 PM, m...@opus11.net wrote: > > Just wondered if anyone has a working solution to creating Lutoslawski-style > box repeats such as this one: https://goo.gl/images/TYKdWt > > I couldn't find a complete solution in either the LSR or mai

Re: Lutoslawski-style box notation

On 11/3/2018 2:54 PM, m...@opus11.net wrote: Just wondered if anyone has a working solution to creating Lutoslawski-style box repeats such as this one: https://goo.gl/images/TYKdWt I couldn't find a complete solution in either the LSR or mailing list archives. If not, I'll start putting toget

Lutoslawski-style box notation

Just wondered if anyone has a working solution to creating Lutoslawski-style box repeats such as this one: https://goo.gl/images/TYKdWt I couldn't find a complete solution in either the LSR or mailing list archives. If not, I'll start putting together something probably based on the frame module f

Re: Reverting TimeSignature after box notation

Brilliant! Thanks! Erik lör 5 aug. 2017 kl 21:54 skrev Thomas Morley : > 2017-08-05 21:09 GMT+02:00 Erik Natanael Gustafsson > : > > > Here is the MWE I arraived at (I don't know how much of the structure > code > > is usually posted here so I'm posting the whole file with score > definition > >

Re: Reverting TimeSignature after box notation

2017-08-05 21:09 GMT+02:00 Erik Natanael Gustafsson : > Here is the MWE I arraived at (I don't know how much of the structure code > is usually posted here so I'm posting the whole file with score definition > and all): [skipping the "whole file"] A minimal would be: \version "2.18.2" { \time

Re: Reverting TimeSignature after box notation

y for box notation. Best, Holland" So I made a minimal example and found the error in the process ("\set Staff.timeSignatureFraction = 4/4" disables all time signatures after that point, it had nothing to do with the markup). But what about if I only want to print an "alternative&

Re: Reverting TimeSignature after box notation

2017-08-05 19:28 GMT+02:00 Erik Natanael Gustafsson : > Whoops, I accidentally sent my reply only to Holland. Here it is again: > > " > Good idea! I made a minimal example Where is it? > and in the process I realised that time > signatures stopped being printed after I used "\set > Staff.timeSign

Re: Reverting TimeSignature after box notation

ortum > (via Gmail) > > On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 3:27 AM, Erik Natanael Gustafsson < > eriknatanaelgustafs...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> I'm working on a piece while learning lilypond. It uses a bit of box >> notation so I have t

Re: Reverting TimeSignature after box notation

7 AM, Erik Natanael Gustafsson < eriknatanaelgustafs...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi! > > I'm working on a piece while learning lilypond. It uses a bit of box > notation so I have the time signatures hidden in the beginning, but then I > want them back. > > After using > \ov

Reverting TimeSignature after box notation

Hi! I'm working on a piece while learning lilypond. It uses a bit of box notation so I have the time signatures hidden in the beginning, but then I want them back. After using \override Staff.TimeSignature.stencil = ##f to remove my time signatures, I can revert back using \r