Re: Bug? \clef makes Staff disappear

2018-11-12 Thread David Kastrup
Thomas Morley writes: > Am Mo., 12. Nov. 2018 um 20:30 Uhr schrieb David Kastrup : > >> It sounds rather shaky to rely on that for code intended to be used as a >> starting point or example. "It's ok if you know what you are doing" is >> not ok when intended to be helpful for people who haven't

Re: Bug? \clef makes Staff disappear

2018-11-12 Thread Thomas Morley
Am Mo., 12. Nov. 2018 um 19:02 Uhr schrieb Torsten Hämmerle : > It really starts getting funny if you change the c' into a d' (the c' just > didn't show up somewhere because it did not change the C major chord): > > %% > << > \chords { c } > \relative { \clef bass d' } > >> > %

Re: Bug? \clef makes Staff disappear

2018-11-12 Thread Thomas Morley
Am Mo., 12. Nov. 2018 um 20:30 Uhr schrieb David Kastrup : > > Torsten Hämmerle writes: > > > David Kastrup wrote > >> If you want a Staff, create it rather than rely on somebody else doing > >> that, maybe. > > > > That is basically what I thought (and wrote), too. > > But, admittedly, these shor

Re: Bug? \clef makes Staff disappear

2018-11-12 Thread David Kastrup
Torsten Hämmerle writes: > David Kastrup wrote >> If you want a Staff, create it rather than rely on somebody else doing >> that, maybe. > > That is basically what I thought (and wrote), too. > But, admittedly, these shortcuts used to work in prior releases and even can > be found in the Notation

Re: Bug? \clef makes Staff disappear

2018-11-12 Thread Malte Meyn
Am 12.11.18 um 19:00 schrieb Torsten Hämmerle: Hi Malte, You'll have to introduce a \new Staff. Otherwise, the \relative clause (pun, pun…) will just be parallel music in ChordNames mode and in ChordNames, there are no clefs. Thanks to both of you, David and Torsten, for the explanations. I

Re: Bug? \clef makes Staff disappear

2018-11-12 Thread Torsten Hämmerle
David Kastrup wrote > If you want a Staff, create it rather than rely on somebody else doing > that, maybe. That is basically what I thought (and wrote), too. But, admittedly, these shortcuts used to work in prior releases and even can be found in the Notation Reference Manual: http://lilypond.or

Re: Bug? \clef makes Staff disappear

2018-11-12 Thread David Kastrup
Malte Meyn writes: > Hi list, > > I’m not sure whether the following comes from my missing knowledge or > a bug. In the code below, adding the clef makes the Staff > disappear. Why? > > % > \version "2.19.82" > > << > \chords { c } > \relative { \clef bass c' } >>>

Re: Bug? \clef makes Staff disappear

2018-11-12 Thread Malte Meyn
Am 12.11.18 um 18:51 schrieb Michael Hendry: On 12 Nov 2018, at 17:30, Malte Meyn wrote: % \version "2.19.82" << \chords { c } \relative { \clef bass c' } % It works correctly for me, but I’m using Lilypond version 2.18.2. It

Re: Bug? \clef makes Staff disappear

2018-11-12 Thread Torsten Hämmerle
Hi Malte, You'll have to introduce a \new Staff. Otherwise, the \relative clause (pun, pun…) will just be parallel music in ChordNames mode and in ChordNames, there are no clefs. It really starts getting funny if you change the c' into a d' (the c' just didn't show up somewhere because it did not

Re: Bug? \clef makes Staff disappear

2018-11-12 Thread Michael Hendry
> On 12 Nov 2018, at 17:30, Malte Meyn wrote: > > % > \version "2.19.82" > > << > \chords { c } > \relative { \clef bass c' } > >> > % It works correctly for me, but I’m using Lilypond version 2.18.2. I’ve always used “\relative” with a

Bug? \clef makes Staff disappear

2018-11-12 Thread Malte Meyn
Hi list, I’m not sure whether the following comes from my missing knowledge or a bug. In the code below, adding the clef makes the Staff disappear. Why? % \version "2.19.82" << \chords { c } \relative { \clef bass c' } >> %