W dniu 31 stycznia 2011 17:06 użytkownik Carl Sorensen
c_soren...@byu.edu napisał:
On 1/31/11 3:04 AM, Jan Warchoł lemniskata.bernoulli...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/1/24 Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
If you use
#(set-accidental-style 'modern-cautionary)
then you get the parenthesised
Hi,
sorry for the delay - i was busy making new flags for Lily.
2011/1/24 Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
- Original Message - From: Jan Warchoł
lemniskata.bernoulli...@gmail.com
I don't agree. *Theoretically* accidental is not needed, but if it
would be omitted, how can you tell
On 1/31/11 3:04 AM, Jan Warchoł lemniskata.bernoulli...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/1/24 Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
If you use
#(set-accidental-style 'modern-cautionary)
then you get the parenthesised accidental automatically, as requested.
Indeed, thanks for the remainder.
However, in
hello
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Kobel n...@a-kobel.de
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:14:23 +0100
To: Jan Warchoł lemniskata.bernoulli...@gmail.com
Cc: lilypond-user lilypond-user@gnu.org, bug-lilypond
bug-lilyp...@gnu.org, lilypond-devel lilypond-de...@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Bug in ties
On 2011-01-31 21:06, James Lowe wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Kobel n...@a-kobel.de
By the way: if you have { r2.. cis8( | c2!) r2 } all over the place,
and then there suddenly comes a { r2 cis2~ | cis2 r2 }, you'd expect an
additional sharp there too, don't you?
Thanks to everyone who responded and explained that Lilypond's
behaviour is correct, and that it is possible to use
set-accidental-style to get the behaviour I expected. I agree with
Janek that the theoretically correct behaviour can be confusing but I
understand better now the differences between
- Original Message -
From: Jan Warchoł lemniskata.bernoulli...@gmail.com
I don't agree. *Theoretically* accidental is not needed, but if it
would be omitted, how can you tell the difference between aes~ | aes
and aes( | a) ?
In my opinion accidental here is necessary (surely it may be
I have (I believe) found a bug in Lilypond, and I am fairly sure what
it is, but I would like to check with people who have better knowledge
of music theory than I before I submit it to the bug list. In the
following code:
{
\time 4/4
aes'1( a')
aes'~ aes'
aes'( aes')
}
I
2011/1/23 Joseph Haig josephh...@gmail.com:
I have (I believe) found a bug in Lilypond, and I am fairly sure what
it is, but I would like to check with people who have better knowledge
of music theory than I before I submit it to the bug list. In the
following code:
{
\time 4/4
On Jan 23, 2011, at 11:09 PM, Joseph Haig wrote:
I have (I believe) found a bug in Lilypond, and I am fairly sure what
it is, but I would like to check with people who have better knowledge
of music theory than I before I submit it to the bug list. In the
following code:
{
\time 4/4
On 23 January 2011 23:09, Joseph Haig josephh...@gmail.com wrote:
I have (I believe) found a bug in Lilypond, and I am fairly sure what
it is, but I would like to check with people who have better knowledge
of music theory than I before I submit it to the bug list. In the
following code:
{
2011/1/23 Xavier Scheuer x.sche...@gmail.com:
On 23 January 2011 23:09, Joseph Haig josephh...@gmail.com wrote:
{
\time 4/4
aes'1( a')
aes'~ aes'
aes'( aes')
}
I believe that the first and third ties are displayed incorrectly.
Specifically, the first tie should have a
12 matches
Mail list logo