Re: Bug in ties over barlines

2011-02-01 Thread Jan Warchoł
W dniu 31 stycznia 2011 17:06 użytkownik Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu napisał: On 1/31/11 3:04 AM, Jan Warchoł lemniskata.bernoulli...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/1/24 Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net If you use #(set-accidental-style 'modern-cautionary) then you get the parenthesised

Re: Bug in ties over barlines

2011-01-31 Thread Jan Warchoł
Hi, sorry for the delay - i was busy making new flags for Lily. 2011/1/24 Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net - Original Message - From: Jan Warchoł lemniskata.bernoulli...@gmail.com I don't agree. *Theoretically* accidental is not needed, but if it would be omitted, how can you tell

Re: Bug in ties over barlines

2011-01-31 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 1/31/11 3:04 AM, Jan Warchoł lemniskata.bernoulli...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/1/24 Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net If you use #(set-accidental-style 'modern-cautionary) then you get the parenthesised accidental automatically, as requested. Indeed, thanks for the remainder. However, in

Re: Bug in ties over barlines

2011-01-31 Thread James Lowe
hello -Original Message- From: Alexander Kobel n...@a-kobel.de Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:14:23 +0100 To: Jan Warchoł lemniskata.bernoulli...@gmail.com Cc: lilypond-user lilypond-user@gnu.org, bug-lilypond bug-lilyp...@gnu.org, lilypond-devel lilypond-de...@gnu.org Subject: Re: Bug in ties

Re: Bug in ties over barlines

2011-01-31 Thread Alexander Kobel
On 2011-01-31 21:06, James Lowe wrote: -Original Message- From: Alexander Kobel n...@a-kobel.de By the way: if you have { r2.. cis8( | c2!) r2 } all over the place, and then there suddenly comes a { r2 cis2~ | cis2 r2 }, you'd expect an additional sharp there too, don't you?

Re: Bug in ties over barlines

2011-01-25 Thread Joseph Haig
Thanks to everyone who responded and explained that Lilypond's behaviour is correct, and that it is possible to use set-accidental-style to get the behaviour I expected. I agree with Janek that the theoretically correct behaviour can be confusing but I understand better now the differences between

Re: Bug in ties over barlines

2011-01-24 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: Jan Warchoł lemniskata.bernoulli...@gmail.com I don't agree. *Theoretically* accidental is not needed, but if it would be omitted, how can you tell the difference between aes~ | aes and aes( | a) ? In my opinion accidental here is necessary (surely it may be

Bug in ties over barlines

2011-01-23 Thread Joseph Haig
I have (I believe) found a bug in Lilypond, and I am fairly sure what it is, but I would like to check with people who have better knowledge of music theory than I before I submit it to the bug list. In the following code: { \time 4/4 aes'1( a') aes'~ aes' aes'( aes') } I

Re: Bug in ties over barlines

2011-01-23 Thread Jan Warchoł
2011/1/23 Joseph Haig josephh...@gmail.com: I have (I believe) found a bug in Lilypond, and I am fairly sure what it is, but I would like to check with people who have better knowledge of music theory than I before I submit it to the bug list. In the following code:  {    \time 4/4    

Re: Bug in ties over barlines

2011-01-23 Thread James Bailey
On Jan 23, 2011, at 11:09 PM, Joseph Haig wrote: I have (I believe) found a bug in Lilypond, and I am fairly sure what it is, but I would like to check with people who have better knowledge of music theory than I before I submit it to the bug list. In the following code: { \time 4/4

Re: Bug in ties over barlines

2011-01-23 Thread Xavier Scheuer
On 23 January 2011 23:09, Joseph Haig josephh...@gmail.com wrote: I have (I believe) found a bug in Lilypond, and I am fairly sure what it is, but I would like to check with people who have better knowledge of music theory than I before I submit it to the bug list. In the following code: {

Re: Bug in ties over barlines

2011-01-23 Thread Jan Warchoł
2011/1/23 Xavier Scheuer x.sche...@gmail.com: On 23 January 2011 23:09, Joseph Haig josephh...@gmail.com wrote:  {    \time 4/4    aes'1( a')    aes'~ aes'    aes'( aes')  } I believe that the first and third ties are displayed incorrectly. Specifically, the first tie should have a