"Mark Stephen Mrotek" writes:
> David,
>
> Since starting Lilypond I have become accustomed to the order presented in
> the manual (2.18.2) that states:
> Voice 1: highest
> Voice 2: lowest
> Voice 3: second highest
> Voice 4: second lowest
> Voice 5: third highest
> Voice 6: third lowest.
>
> Th
Werner LEMBERG writes:
>> Werner, that does not even make sense. [...]
>
> Ok, I completely misunderstood you, sorry.
Well, I wasn't being verbose enough anyway. The main problem I was
trying to address is \voiceTwo having really no inherent connection to
second voice beyond two voices. Admit
> Werner, that does not even make sense. [...]
Ok, I completely misunderstood you, sorry.
Werner
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
lilyp...@maltemeyn.de writes:
> Am 2016-10-27 13:40, schrieb David Kastrup:
>> while the documentation is quite explicit that, ordered from top to
>> bottom, assignments should be more like
>>
>> 1/2, 3/1/2, 3/1/2/4, 5/3/1/2/4, 5/3/1/2/4/6 ...
>>
>> namely keeping the small voice numbers for the i
David Kastrup writes:
> Werner LEMBERG writes:
>
This concerns << ... \\ ... \\ ... ... >>
If we have more than one voice, voices are assigned in order:
1/2, 1/2/3, 1/2/3/4, 1/2/3/4/5, 1/2/3/4/5/6 ...
while the documentation is quite explicit that, ordered from top
On 10/27/16 6:18 AM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of Urs Liska"
wrote:
>
>
>Am 27. Oktober 2016 04:40:14 GMT-07:00, schrieb David Kastrup
>:
>>
>>This concerns << ... \\ ... \\ ... ... >>
>>
>>If we have more than one voice, voices are assigned in order:
>>
>>1/2, 1/2/3, 1/2/3/4, 1/2/3/4/5, 1/2/3/4/
Werner LEMBERG writes:
>>>This concerns << ... \\ ... \\ ... ... >>
>>>
>>>If we have more than one voice, voices are assigned in order:
>>>
>>>1/2, 1/2/3, 1/2/3/4, 1/2/3/4/5, 1/2/3/4/5/6 ...
>>>
>>>while the documentation is quite explicit that, ordered from top to
>>>bottom, assignments should
Am 2016-10-27 13:40, schrieb David Kastrup:
while the documentation is quite explicit that, ordered from top to
bottom, assignments should be more like
1/2, 3/1/2, 3/1/2/4, 5/3/1/2/4, 5/3/1/2/4/6 ...
namely keeping the small voice numbers for the inner voices.
Are you sure? I always understoo
>>This concerns << ... \\ ... \\ ... ... >>
>>
>>If we have more than one voice, voices are assigned in order:
>>
>>1/2, 1/2/3, 1/2/3/4, 1/2/3/4/5, 1/2/3/4/5/6 ...
>>
>>while the documentation is quite explicit that, ordered from top to
>>bottom, assignments should be more like
>>
>>1/2, 3/1/2, 3/
Am 27. Oktober 2016 04:40:14 GMT-07:00, schrieb David Kastrup :
>
>This concerns << ... \\ ... \\ ... ... >>
>
>If we have more than one voice, voices are assigned in order:
>
>1/2, 1/2/3, 1/2/3/4, 1/2/3/4/5, 1/2/3/4/5/6 ...
>
>while the documentation is quite explicit that, ordered from top to
>
This concerns << ... \\ ... \\ ... ... >>
If we have more than one voice, voices are assigned in order:
1/2, 1/2/3, 1/2/3/4, 1/2/3/4/5, 1/2/3/4/5/6 ...
while the documentation is quite explicit that, ordered from top to
bottom, assignments should be more like
1/2, 3/1/2, 3/1/2/4, 5/3/1/2/4, 5/
101 - 111 of 111 matches
Mail list logo