Re: Choosing glyph variants

2016-09-01 Thread Erik Ronström
> if it’s about easier maintenance or nicer code, you might do something like > this: > > %% > \version "2.19.47" > computer-modern = ##f > flqq = #(if computer-modern #{ \markup { \char #"#xF101" } #} "»") > \markup \flqq > %% Nice one, thanks! Actually, in my specific case, I’

Re: Choosing glyph variants

2016-09-01 Thread Simon Albrecht
On 29.08.2016 23:26, Erik Ronström wrote: I found another workaround: even though the glyph variants share the same codepoint in the font, the alternative glyphs are actually defined in the unicode ”Private Use Area”, so they also have codepoints of their own. So I just replaced all » characte

Re: Choosing glyph variants

2016-08-29 Thread Hans Åberg
> On 29 Aug 2016, at 23:26, Erik Ronström wrote: > > I found another workaround: even though the glyph variants share the same > codepoint in the font, the alternative glyphs are actually defined in the > unicode ”Private Use Area”, so they also have codepoints of their own. So I > just repla

Re: Choosing glyph variants

2016-08-29 Thread Erik Ronström
I found another workaround: even though the glyph variants share the same codepoint in the font, the alternative glyphs are actually defined in the unicode ”Private Use Area”, so they also have codepoints of their own. So I just replaced all » characters in the lilypond source with the unicode

Re: Choosing glyph variants

2016-08-29 Thread Hans Åberg
> On 29 Aug 2016, at 22:02, Erik Ronström wrote: > I’m using Computer Modern in my score to match the surrounding text (set in > LaTeX). However, I discovered that the french quotes (guillemet) display > differently in the lyrics, compared to the TeX text (see attached image). There is LuaLaT