Re: Collision between tie and pitched trill

2012-01-21 Thread Xavier Scheuer
On 20 January 2012 17:40, Caio Barros caio.bar...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, I understand this. But isn't the purpose of lilypond to automatize the position of the objects? That's why I don't have to say to each slur, tie and dynamics where they should be, it's angle, if it's up or down. A lot of

Re: Collision between tie and pitched trill

2012-01-20 Thread Patrick Karl
OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Collision between tie and pitched trill Yes, but it's still a collision. It looks ok at 2.14.2. I don't see a collision. 2012/1/19 Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net Caio Barros caio.barros at gmail.com writes

Re: Collision between tie and pitched trill

2012-01-20 Thread Caio Barros
But the collision disappears if you use Keith Ohara's suggestion to force the tie below the note head. Yes, I understand this. But isn't the purpose of lilypond to automatize the position of the objects? That's why I don't have to say to each slur, tie and dynamics where they should be, it's

Re: Collision between tie and pitched trill

2012-01-19 Thread Patrick Karl
Message: 2 Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:34:09 -0200 From: Caio Barros caio.bar...@gmail.com To: Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Collision between tie and pitched trill Yes, but it's still a collision. It looks ok at 2.14.2. I don't see a collision

Re: Collision between tie and pitched trill

2012-01-19 Thread Caio Barros
To: Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Collision between tie and pitched trill Yes, but it's still a collision. It looks ok at 2.14.2. I don't see a collision. 2012/1/19 Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net Caio Barros caio.barros at gmail.com writes

Collision between tie and pitched trill

2012-01-18 Thread Caio Barros
This was already said in the list ( http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2008-10/msg00765.html) but the user forgot to attach the code and there was no further discussion. It seems that ties collide with pitched trill: \version 2.14.2 \relative g'' { \pitchedTrill g1 ~

Re: Collision between tie and pitched trill

2012-01-18 Thread Keith OHara
Caio Barros caio.barros at gmail.com writes: \relative g'' { \pitchedTrill g1 ~ \startTrillSpan aes g2 } You can use '^' or '_' to force the tie above or below the note head { \pitchedTrill g''1_~ \startTrillSpan aes g''2 } ___ lilypond-user

Re: Collision between tie and pitched trill

2012-01-18 Thread Caio Barros
Yes, but it's still a collision. 2012/1/19 Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net Caio Barros caio.barros at gmail.com writes: \relative g'' { \pitchedTrill g1 ~ \startTrillSpan aes g2 } You can use '^' or '_' to force the tie above or below the note head { \pitchedTrill g''1_~

collision between tie and pitched trill

2008-10-25 Thread Stefan Thomas
Dear lilypond-users, in the below quoted example I get a collision between the tie an the trill note. How can I avoid this? ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: collision between tie and pitched trill

2008-10-25 Thread Jonathan Kulp
You forgot to attach the code! Jon Stefan Thomas wrote: Dear lilypond-users, in the below quoted example I get a collision between the tie an the trill note. How can I avoid this?