2008/11/10 Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I forgot about that. Look at my second email in that thread.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2008-10/msg00681.html
Thanks for the pointer. After a couple hours' tweaking I came up with
these. I ruthlessly exploited your
Risto, Graham
These functions will work fine for any time signature
and beam duration for which there are no beam-ending
rules defined in scm/auto-beam.scm. But if beam-ending
rules exist they take priority over beatGrouping. This
is why you find 12/8 grouping is messed up, Risto.
(Although a
On 08/11/2008, Neil Puttock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The second column needs to be aligned in relation to the first using
\left-align:
Thanks a lot, Neil.
Anyway... I made yet another type of time compound signature. This
time the descriptive part is wrapped in parentheses. Since I
couldn't
What a beautiful job!
Can these be added to the LSR?
Ralph
Anyway... I made yet another type of time compound signature. This
time the descriptive part is wrapped in parentheses. Since I
couldn't find a way to add the parentheses with LP commands I used
PostScript instead.
-Risto
--
Those are beautiful, Risto! I'm saving for future use. :)
Jon
Risto Vääräniemi wrote:
On 08/11/2008, Neil Puttock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The second column needs to be aligned in relation to the first using
\left-align:
Thanks a lot, Neil.
Anyway... I made yet another type of time
On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 01:00:04PM +0200, Risto V??r?niemi wrote:
Anyway... I made yet another type of time compound signature. This
time the descriptive part is wrapped in parentheses. Since I
couldn't find a way to add the parentheses with LP commands I used
PostScript instead.
You could
2008/11/9 Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You could use \bracket, although I would just recommend (.
I tried ( but they looked too wide if I just scaled them. I searched
for a function that would allow markup stretching but couldn't find
one (I did find an old message where someone else was
2008/11/9 Ralph Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What a beautiful job!
Can these be added to the LSR?
OK by me.
-Risto
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 04:46:53PM +0200, Risto V??r?niemi wrote:
2008/11/9 Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Also note that this method only displays the compound time; it
doesn't change the beaming.
That's true. I didn't know how to implement such a feature and I
wanted to use this
2008/11/9 Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 04:46:53PM +0200, Risto V??r?niemi wrote:
2008/11/9 Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Also note that this method only displays the compound time; it
doesn't change the beaming.
That's true. I didn't know how to
On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 11:38:26PM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote:
2008/11/9 Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 04:46:53PM +0200, Risto V??r?niemi wrote:
2008/11/9 Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Also note that this method only displays the compound time; it
Hi Risto
I recently revised the section on beaming in the Notation Reference.
If you've not looked at it recently the answer might be there. See
NR 1.2.4 Beams. The precise method for changing the beaming depends
on the time signature and the beam duration, so a simple answer can't
be given.
12 matches
Mail list logo
