Le 01/11/2022 à 19:59, David Kastrup a écrit :
It makes more sense if
a) a tweak on an to-be-expanded chord (no non-post-event chord elements)
is applied to the ChordEvent expression itself after all.
b) when expanding a RepeatChord, tweaks get copied over to the created
elements.
That adds
Werner LEMBERG writes:
>> [...] As you can deduce from the existence of the \chordRepeats
>> function, the substitution of q is not immediate. In contrast,
>> \tweak takes effect immediately by modifying each of the notes in
>> the chord. Since there are no notes yet in the "q" chord at the
>>
> [...] As you can deduce from the existence of the \chordRepeats
> function, the substitution of q is not immediate. In contrast,
> \tweak takes effect immediately by modifying each of the notes in
> the chord. Since there are no notes yet in the "q" chord at the
> time \tweak is applied
Le 31/10/2022 à 16:08, Paul Hodges a écrit :
I wanted to lengthen the stem of a pair of tied chords, but it didn't
work as expected. After some playing around, I found that I cannot
tweak the properties of a chord represented by q (repeating the
previous chord), but that the tweaks on the
Oops - start should read:
I wanted to lengthen the stem of only the second of a pair of tied chords.
From: Paul Hodges
To:
Sent: 31/10/2022 15:08
Subject: Curious behaviour of q and a tweak
I wanted to lengthen the stem of a pair of tied chords, but it didn't work
I wanted to lengthen the stem of a pair of tied chords, but it didn't work as
expected. After some playing around, I found that I cannot tweak the
properties of a chord represented by q (repeating the previous chord), but that
the tweaks on the original chord get carried over. This example
