Hi,
I believe I've just discovered a bug.
Running the development version of lily
(2.17.5, commit bc4b56a8dee39a1fa3f40ac329ab0754d46fc56f )
the following snippet produces two notes next to each other, without any
visible barline at all. See the attached image.
I checked it in the current
And - 2.16.0 is free of this bug.
J.
2012/11/3 Jakub Pavlík jkb.pav...@gmail.com
Hi,
I believe I've just discovered a bug.
Running the development version of lily
(2.17.5, commit bc4b56a8dee39a1fa3f40ac329ab0754d46fc56f )
the following snippet produces two notes next to each other,
2012/11/3 Jakub Pavlík jkb.pav...@gmail.com:
And - 2.16.0 is free of this bug.
J.
2012/11/3 Jakub Pavlík jkb.pav...@gmail.com
Hi,
I believe I've just discovered a bug.
Running the development version of lily
(2.17.5, commit bc4b56a8dee39a1fa3f40ac329ab0754d46fc56f )
the following
Ok.
I'm sorry for the noise
and thankful for the explanation.
Jakub
2012/11/3 Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com
2012/11/3 Jakub Pavlík jkb.pav...@gmail.com:
And - 2.16.0 is free of this bug.
J.
2012/11/3 Jakub Pavlík jkb.pav...@gmail.com
Hi,
I believe I've just
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes:
no bug, but the barline-interface is heavily changed with 2.17.5.
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/changes-big-page.html
It's now very easy to define own custom-BarLines.
But there was need to change several strings.
: is now
2012/11/3 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
[...]
The convert-ly rules for 2.17.5 state
str = re.sub (barstring + r':', '\\1\\2;', str)
which is not really related to !. Is this an oversight?
No.
Rereading Jakub's initial mail, I think he confused dotted with dashed.
In 2.16.0 : was used
