Re: Doc: document \on-the-fly (2579) (issue 6347062)

2012-07-10 Thread tdanielsmusic
Patch pushed 91ca3dbe2cd40f8eedce48ee02c7c98a2ec89413 http://codereview.appspot.com/6347062/ ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Doc: document \on-the-fly (2579) (issue 6347062)

2012-07-08 Thread graham
LGTM http://codereview.appspot.com/6347062/ ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Doc: document \on-the-fly (2579) (issue 6347062)

2012-07-06 Thread tdanielsmusic
On 2012/07/06 07:38:05, dak wrote: Yes, it's best to drop the verb. That is more consistent with the rest of the table. But we are nitpicking here, aren't we :) Done. http://codereview.appspot.com/6347062/ ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-use

Re: Doc: document \on-the-fly (2579) (issue 6347062)

2012-07-06 Thread dak
http://codereview.appspot.com/6347062/diff/1002/Documentation/notation/input.itely File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/6347062/diff/1002/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode1017 Documentation/notation/input.itely:1017: @item (on-page nmbr) @ta

Re: Doc: document \on-the-fly (2579) (issue 6347062)

2012-07-06 Thread tdanielsmusic
http://codereview.appspot.com/6347062/diff/1002/Documentation/notation/input.itely File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/6347062/diff/1002/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode1017 Documentation/notation/input.itely:1017: @item (on-page nmbr) @ta