Re: Documentation Review

2008-09-27 Thread Trevor Daniels
Valentin, you wrote Saturday, September 27, 2008 7:41 PM I'm sure there's plenty of room for improvements, but could we add NR 1.8 "Text" to the list of sections to be reviewed? Corrections, suggestions and criticism are welcome! Done! This is a major piece of work! We now need reviewers fo

Re: Documentation Review

2008-09-27 Thread Valentin Villenave
2008/9/22 Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Several sections of the Learning Manual and most of the first > two Chapters of the Notation Reference are ready for review by users, and it > would be good to bring these to the best possible state before 2.12 is > released. Greetings Trevor, I'm

Searching the docs (was: Re: Documentation Review)

2008-09-24 Thread Sebastian Menge
Am Wed, 24 Sep 2008 11:05:59 +0200 schrieb Sebastian Menge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=site%3Alilypond.org+inurl%3Av2.11+blah Another refinement: Add "intitle:Manual" or "intitle:Reference" to search only the manual or the reference. More here: http://www.google.

Re: Documentation Review

2008-09-24 Thread Sebastian Menge
Am Wed, 24 Sep 2008 10:14:00 +0200 schrieb Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On di, 2008-09-23 at 23:16 +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote: > > 2008/9/23 Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > We have one on the main page of lilypond.org, but unfortunately > > > it often finds hits in

Re: Documentation Review

2008-09-24 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
On di, 2008-09-23 at 23:16 +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote: > 2008/9/23 Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > We have one on the main page of lilypond.org, but unfortunately > > it often finds hits in old versions of the documentation first. > > Hadn't we solved this problem by adding an appr

Re: Documentation Review

2008-09-23 Thread Valentin Villenave
2008/9/23 Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > We have one on the main page of lilypond.org, but unfortunately > it often finds hits in old versions of the documentation first. Hadn't we solved this problem by adding an appropriate robots.txt? http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/200

Re: Documentation Review

2008-09-23 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Trevor Daniels wrote: Sebastian Menge wrote Monday, September 22, 2008 9:54 PM I would suggest: * a search engine field at the top of the main template (cf wikipedia) It would be nice, and others are pressing for this, but it poses some problems. We have one on the main page of lilypond.

Re: Documentation Review

2008-09-22 Thread Trevor Daniels
Sebastian Menge wrote Monday, September 22, 2008 9:54 PM I would suggest: * a search engine field at the top of the main template (cf wikipedia) It would be nice, and others are pressing for this, but it poses some problems. * way more hyperlinks: especially between corresponding parts

Re: Documentation Review

2008-09-22 Thread Sebastian Menge
Perhaps a bit off topic: Im using lilypond only once a year or so. Then every time I have to read a lot of the docs again. Since i remember most things then, i'm quite quick (getting quicker every time ;-) ), but I must admit that I dont find my way through the docs as quickly as I could: I would

Re: Documentation Review

2008-09-22 Thread Stan Sanderson
A rousing hip, hip, hurrah to the authors of the documentation. Few (if any) commercial products can boast of similar quality! Regards, Stan On Sep 22, 2008, at 1:58 PM, Jonathan Kulp wrote: Well spotted! I should have seen it from the fact that it's impossible to play this way, if not fr

Re: Documentation Review

2008-09-22 Thread Jonathan Kulp
Well spotted! I should have seen it from the fact that it's impossible to play this way, if not from the facsimile itself (which I just checked, too). Thanks, Stan. I'll fix and send to Carl. Jonathan Stan Sanderson wrote: On Sep 22, 2008, at 12:02 PM, Trevor Daniels wrote: but further

Re: Documentation Review

2008-09-22 Thread Stan Sanderson
On Sep 22, 2008, at 12:02 PM, Trevor Daniels wrote: but further comments are welcome. Re: sect. 2.4 The motivating example is beautifully set, but has an incorrect fingering in the second measure. The next to the last eighth note (e above middle c) should be fingered with the first finger

Documentation Review

2008-09-22 Thread Trevor Daniels
Help needed to review documentation before 2.12 is released. --- Several sections of the Learning Manual and most of the first two Chapters of the Notation Reference are ready for review by users, and it would be good to bring these to the