> On 3 Feb 2022, at 19:04, Knute Snortum wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 9:32 AM Leo Correia de Verdier
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2022, 11:51 AM Kieren MacMillan
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
Speaking as a keyboard player (and lilypond novice) I would recommend
I’m personally not a fan of the splayed stem notation - I’ve never seen it
before so it makes me go “what?” before I get to the notes. It also sort of
looks like the a natural should be played first because it’s stem goes down
to the beam? I would rather have the b-double flat notation - then the
On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 9:32 AM Leo Correia de Verdier
wrote:
>
> I differ on that. For me, (and with the perspective of only this measure)
> both the option of respelling the a flat in only that chord (looks like the
> repeated a flat moves) and respelling the a flats in the whole measure (and
I differ on that. For me, (and with the perspective of only this measure) both
the option of respelling the a flat in only that chord (looks like the repeated
a flat moves) and respelling the a flats in the whole measure (and having to
read the second between a flat and b flat as a diminished
I also would prefer to see a G#. However between the two examples, I think
the first is slightly more readable.
That said, what are the subsequent A's supposed to be - flat or natural? As
written, I would play them as naturals in the first example, but flats in
the second example. Were I
Hi all,
> Speaking as a keyboard player (and lilypond novice) I would recommend
> re-spelling the a flat as a g sharp! Sometimes, theory has to take a backseat
> to readability.
If theoretical correctness (or, say, accuracy to a previous source) isn't a
requirement, then I agree with Charlie:
Hi Knute,
Speaking as a keyboard player (and lilypond novice) I would recommend
re-spelling the a flat as a g sharp! Sometimes, theory has to take a
backseat to readability. If the a natural is supposed to sound before the a
flat, I might write that one as a grace note to an arpeggiated dyad.
Hi everyone,
I've run into a situation where I need to engrave a chord that has the
same note twice, but with different accidentals. Like this (third
chord):
%%%
\version "2.22.1"
\language "english"
\relative {
\key ef \major
\time 3/4
8-.\arpeggio \arpeggio( \arpeggio
\arpeggio
