Please keep LilyPond emails on the mailing list; that way the answers
are archived
and everybody can search for them.
I must admit that I was wrong about the Britten suites, but it's
possible that somebody,
somewhere, wants the line closer to the notehead. We could probably
remove the
-_ artic
Thanks for your answer.
Since combinaison of dot and line whith line closer to the notehead seems used,
but less than the oposite, may I propose that the notation "-_" "-.--" should be
reversed ? ( "-_" for the most common case (the dot closer to the notehead), and
-.-- for the line near the notehe
On 30-Oct-04, at 5:03 AM, Alexandre Beneteau wrote:
I am wondering if the new articulation _ (which produce a dot and a _
over the notehead) does not print it wrongly.
If you use "-.--" then Lilypond will print the dot closer to the
notehead. "-_" is supposed to be used when you want the line cl
Hello,
I am wondering if the new articulation _ (which produce a dot and a _ over the
notehead) does not print it wrongly.
I explain myself : I think the dot should be near the notehead and the _ (don't
find the english word !) should be after it, like this :
_
.
x
|
|
But actually, lilypond pri
