On 5/30/20, Thomas Morley wrote:
> add-stem-support is not really documented.
> Alas, I've not the time and energy to write a patch myself and fight
> my way through the new GitLab process.
“Fighting your way” sounds pretty accurate these days.
If I may give it a try:
https://gitlab.com/lilypond
Am Sa., 30. Mai 2020 um 13:18 Uhr schrieb David Kastrup :
>
> Thomas Morley writes:
>
> > Alas, I've not the time and energy to write a patch myself and fight
> > my way through the new GitLab process.
>
> git push -o merge_request.create -o merge_request.title="My patch" -o
> merge_request.remov
Thomas Morley writes:
> Alas, I've not the time and energy to write a patch myself and fight
> my way through the new GitLab process.
git push -o merge_request.create -o merge_request.title="My patch" -o
merge_request.remove_source_branch origin HEAD:my-proposed-branch-name
The push message gi
Am Sa., 30. Mai 2020 um 10:15 Uhr schrieb Valentin Villenave
:
>
> On 5/30/20, Thomas Morley wrote:
> > Fingering.add-stem-support is per default set to 'only-if-beamed'
>
> Of course!! I vaguely remembered having come across something like
> that. Sorry for making a fool of myself.
>
> > Try:
>
On 5/30/20, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> Excellent; NOTABUT then.
Ouch. NOTABUG. (Though I can’t say I wasn’t childishly tempted to
add an additional T :-)
V.
On 5/30/20, Thomas Morley wrote:
> Fingering.add-stem-support is per default set to 'only-if-beamed'
Of course!! I vaguely remembered having come across something like
that. Sorry for making a fool of myself.
> Try:
> \override Fingering.add-stem-support = #'()
> and it'll work
Excellent; NOT
Am Sa., 30. Mai 2020 um 00:08 Uhr schrieb Valentin Villenave
:
>
> On 5/29/20, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote:
> > Hi Simone,
> > A basic solution:
> > \relative c' {
> > \stemUp
> > \override Fingering.staff-padding = #'()
> > 4 8
> > }
>
> Sure there are workarounds, but: shouldn’t we be tr
On 5/29/20, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote:
> Hi Simone,
> A basic solution:
> \relative c' {
> \stemUp
> \override Fingering.staff-padding = #'()
> 4 8
> }
Sure there are workarounds, but: shouldn’t we be treating this as a
bug? There’s no obvious reason why unsetting staff-padding should b
Should be simple enough to just tweak the vertical offset.
\relative c' {
\stemUp
\override Fingering.staff-padding = #'()
4 g'8-\tweak Y-offset #0 -0 g'
}
Hi Simone,
A basic solution:
\version "2.20.0"
\relative c' {
\stemUp
\override Fingering.staff-padding = #'()
4 8
}
Cheers,
Pierre
Le ven. 29 mai 2020 à 15:20, Simone Capretti a
écrit :
> Hello to all,
>
> I've read in the manual that it's possible to insert fingering inside the
> staf
Hello to all,
I've read in the manual that it's possible to insert fingering inside
the staff:
\relative c' {
\stemUp
\override Fingering.staff-padding = #'()
4 8
}
however, if you have notes that are tied together the fingering is
always outside the staff:
\relative c' {
\
nal Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+t.daniels=treda.co.u
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Mats Bengtsson
> Sent: 27 February 2008 22:37
> To: Francisco Vila
> Cc: lilypond-user
> Subject: Re: Fingering inside staff
>
>
> Please
Please read the section on fingering again, especially
the part on fingeringOrientations. Note that these only
work when the notes are part of a chord. If you want it
to happen on a single note, you therefore have to make
it a single note chord, such as 8
/Mats
Francisco Vila wrote:
Hello al
Hello all,
Is it possible to place fingerings inside the staff (or outside, but
just next to the notehead), and at a maximum distance of the notehead
of, say, two staff spaces?
I would like to set this voice-wide, not for a single fingering.
Thank you,
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
http://w
14 matches
Mail list logo
