On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 08:22:53AM +1000, Nick Payne wrote:
> On 19/08/12 16:46, Nick Payne wrote:
> >In a chord containing a second, if I place the fingering above the
> >notes to avoid having the fingering numerals overlapping each
> >other (see
> >https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail
On 19/08/12 16:46, Nick Payne wrote:
In a chord containing a second, if I place the fingering above the
notes to avoid having the fingering numerals overlapping each other
(see https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2541), then
the numerals default to being placed much higher above
In a chord containing a second, if I place the fingering above the notes
to avoid having the fingering numerals overlapping each other (see
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2541), then the
numerals default to being placed much higher above the noteheads than is
normal or if e
In the following example, forcing the staccato to appear below the note
also moves the fingering from immediately below the notehead to below
the staccato marking, and I haven't found a way to stop this happening
- setting Fingering #'outside-staff-priority to ##f or a negative value
doesn't ch
