classes/functions/variables in that file.
I guess that's all for now :)
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Follow-up-question-to-alternate-music-fonts-tp164259p164385.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Hi,
2014-07-10 19:25 GMT+02:00 tisimst tisi...@gmail.com:
All,
Is there anyone who is VERY against distributing music fonts in binary form
(i.e., as otf, svg, etc.files)? I just don't see how we can make other music
fonts available by forcing them to have a metafont source file. I guess that
tisimst tisi...@gmail.com writes:
All,
Is there anyone who is VERY against distributing music fonts in binary form
(i.e., as otf, svg, etc.files)? I just don't see how we can make other music
fonts available by forcing them to have a metafont source file. I guess that
could be nice, but it
Am 11.07.2014 07:00, schrieb David Kastrup:
tisimst tisi...@gmail.com writes:
All,
Is there anyone who is VERY against distributing music fonts in binary form
(i.e., as otf, svg, etc.files)? I just don't see how we can make other music
fonts available by forcing them to have a metafont source
On 11/07/14 08:01, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 11.07.2014 07:00, schrieb David Kastrup:
tisimst tisi...@gmail.com writes:
All,
Is there anyone who is VERY against distributing music fonts in
binary form
(i.e., as otf, svg, etc.files)? I just don't see how we can make
other music
fonts available
Am 11.07.2014 10:16, schrieb James:
On 11/07/14 08:01, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 11.07.2014 07:00, schrieb David Kastrup:
tisimst tisi...@gmail.com writes:
All,
Is there anyone who is VERY against distributing music fonts in
binary form
(i.e., as otf, svg, etc.files)? I just don't see how we can
have about 4 or
5 alternate music fonts that people could use and I certainly don't want to
convert them to metafont. They are currently designed and built with
fontforge.
What do you think?
-Abraham
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Follow-up-question
