Sorry, forgot to CC the list... ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Henrik Frisk <fris...@gmail.com> Date: Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 9:55 AM Subject: Re: Text fonts To: Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org>
> >> but I'm guessing /usr/share/fonts is just as good > > Well, yes, but I consider it a bad thing to install local stuff into > the /usr tree. A better place is /usr/local/share/fonts. However, > you should check /etc/fonts/conf.d whether this directory is scanned > by fontconfig by default. Alas, there isn't a GUI for fontconfig yet, > as far as I know, which would greatly simplify the manipulation of > such issues. > I can live without the GUI now that I know what to look for and where to find it. But, yes, I guess it would be nice. >> (since that's where the lilypond fonts live)? > > This is the wrong reason. LilyPond fonts could be installed at any > place since it explicitly tells fontconfig to scan its own font > directory. > As I said, I know very little about fonts... How and when does Lilypond/fontconfig scan for new fonts? /Henrik _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
