Re: GDP: NR Specification

2007-11-11 Thread Graham Percival
Eyolf Østrem wrote: On 08.11.2007 (15:44), Graham Percival wrote: Based on the recent discussions, what should change in the written policy? I'd say: the following sentence: However, they should be familiar with the material in the Learning Manual (particularly ``Fundamental Concepts''),

Re: GDP: NR Specification

2007-11-10 Thread Eyolf Østrem
On 08.11.2007 (15:44), Graham Percival wrote: > Based on the recent discussions, what should change in the written policy? I'd say: the following sentence: > However, they should be familiar with the material in the Learning > Manual (particularly ``Fundamental Concepts''), so do not repeat >

Re: GDP: NR Specification

2007-11-08 Thread Graham Percival
Trevor Daniels wrote: I do too. I wonder if it might be useful to discuss and find a consensus on what the purpose of the NR is in rather more detail? Here's a strawman specification to knock about if people think a specification might be useful to guide documentation writers in the future.