Re: Grouped Beams

2010-02-12 Thread Nick Payne
Actually, I stuttered on the 4s. The override should be: sixteenthNotesBeamedInFours = \overrideBeamSettings #'Voice #'(2 . 2) #'end #'((* . (1 1)) ((1 . 16) . (4 4 4 4)) ((1 . 32) . (8 8 8 8))) On 12/02/10 19:20, grisu_76 wrote: wounderful! thx a lot! cheers, christian Nick Payne-3 wro

Re: Grouped Beams

2010-02-12 Thread grisu_76
>>> Which version of LilyPond are you using? The answer is different for >>> versions 2.12 and 2.13. >>> >>> /Mats >>> >>> >>> >>> ___ >>> lilypond-user mailing list >>>

Re: Grouped Beams

2010-02-11 Thread Nick Payne
Something like this: \version "2.13.12" sixteenthNotesBeamedInFours = \overrideBeamSettings #'Voice #'(2 . 2) #'end #'((* . (1 1)) ((1 . 16) . (4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4)) ((1 . 32) . (8 8 8 8))) \relative c' { \time 2/2 \repeat unfold 32 c16 \sixteenthNotesBeamedInFours \repeat unfold 32 c

Re: Grouped Beams

2010-02-11 Thread grisu_76
user@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Grouped-Beams-tp27547783p27554700.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___

Re: Grouped Beams

2010-02-11 Thread Mats Bengtsson
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 07:31 -0800, grisu_76 wrote: > Hello! > > How to beam 4 16th-notes in a 2/2 automatically? got severe problem with the > > override-auto-beam-setting > > afraid, I did not get the idea behind..? Which version of LilyPond are you using? The answer is different for versions

Grouped Beams

2010-02-11 Thread grisu_76
Hello! How to beam 4 16th-notes in a 2/2 automatically? got severe problem with the override-auto-beam-setting afraid, I did not get the idea behind..? cheers, christian -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Grouped-Beams-tp27547783p27547783.html Sent from the Gnu

Re: Grouped beams

2010-01-31 Thread Frank Steinmetzger
Am Montag, 1. Februar 2010 schrieb Carl Sorensen: > > I'm already working with override-auto-beam-setting to have all those > > groups of 8. 16 8 you can see in my screenshot automatically separated: > > > > #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * * 8) 3 8) > > #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end *

Re: Grouped beams

2010-01-31 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 1/31/10 11:23 AM, "Frank Steinmetzger" wrote: > Hi group, > > I've got two questions concerning the attached measure (you see the original > and my attempt on reproducing it). > How can I achieve a similar "grouping" of beams? I.e. having one beam go > through, and the rest grouped. And se

Re: Grouped beams

2010-01-31 Thread Frank Steinmetzger
Am Sonntag, 31. Januar 2010 schrieb James Bailey: > On 31.01.2010, at 19:23, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > Hi group, > > > > I've got two questions concerning the attached measure (you see the > > original and my attempt on reproducing it). > I can't tell if there's a difference by your code, but

Re: Grouped beams

2010-01-31 Thread James Bailey
On 31.01.2010, at 19:23, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: Hi group, I've got two questions concerning the attached measure (you see the original and my attempt on reproducing it). How can I achieve a similar "grouping" of beams? I.e. having one beam go through, and the rest grouped. And secondly

Grouped beams

2010-01-31 Thread Frank Steinmetzger
Hi group, I've got two questions concerning the attached measure (you see the original and my attempt on reproducing it). How can I achieve a similar "grouping" of beams? I.e. having one beam go through, and the rest grouped. And secondly, how can I get the \times mark on top of it? I'm alread