A good explanation of the difference between define and set! in Scheme here:
https://docs.scheme.org/schintro/schintro_16.html
Silvain
Le 22.08.24 à 11:10, Valentin Petzel a écrit :
Hi Michael,
the problematic line in question is
(#t (define *use-gamba-clefs* #t))
If you use set! instead of d
Hi Michael,
the problematic line in question is
(#t (define *use-gamba-clefs* #t))
If you use set! instead of define it will work. The problem here lies probably
in the switch from guile 1.8 to guile 2. I suppose in that the context of case
changed somehow to not allow definitions.
Keep in mi
Dear William,
thanks a lot for your help. With your changes I got the scores to compile.
With the problem of getting the score compiled solved I investigated how
possibly those options could be set or used.
There is no documentation included as to how the option clefs is supposed to
work. Ther
Dear Michael,
When I change
#(define *clefs-option* (ly:get-option 'clefs))
to
#(define *clefs-option* 'gamba)
and
(#t (define *use-gamba-clefs* #t))
to
(#t (set! *use-gamba-clefs* #t)) ; note "set!"
lilypond 2.25.18 compiles the code without any errors. But I don't know
if this will ma
Dear lilyponders,
I've donwloaded some older lilypond sources (version 2.18.2) from
cpdl.org and am trying to make them work with 2.25.18.
Most things are straight forward however there is some scheme code that
allows to switch between different clefs.
Could someone with better scheme fu th
Thanks, Aaron.
On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 4:46 PM Aaron Hill wrote:
> On 2020-10-18 1:38 pm, Dave Seidel wrote:
> > Very cool, thanks! I'm curious -- could aBook and aBookPart have been
> > written as a lambda, or is it cleaner to use a void function?
>
> (Re-adding the mailing list on the thread f
On 2020-10-18 1:38 pm, Dave Seidel wrote:
Very cool, thanks! I'm curious -- could aBook and aBookPart have been
written as a lambda, or is it cleaner to use a void function?
(Re-adding the mailing list on the thread for visibility.)
To get the benefits of LilyPond's Scheme functions, you would
On 2020-10-18 7:52 am, Dave Seidel wrote:
Having articulated the question, I figured out that apparently one
can't
return a \bookpart from a Scheme function, but it's ok to return a
\score,
so I am restructuring my code.
You cannot return a \book or \bookpart but you can do this:
\versi
Having articulated the question, I figured out that apparently one can't
return a \bookpart from a Scheme function, but it's ok to return a \score,
so I am restructuring my code.
On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 10:28 AM Dave Seidel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a multi-section piece, with a master .ly file th
Hi,
I have a multi-section piece, with a master .ly file that uses \include for
each of the sections of the piece. Each included file more or less follows
the pattern of the string quartet template that ships with Lilypond: a
series of macros, one per voice, followed by a \bookpart section that
bu
t)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> P
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 6:57 PM wrote:
>>
>>> Without giving you any solution, I can give you a hint:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Write the music in the traditional way, with and without your
>>> modi
with and without your
>> modification.
>>
>>
>>
>> In your lilypond file put:
>>
>> \displayMusic oldmusic
>>
>> \displayMusic newmusic
>>
>>
>>
>> And what you can see wht you have to write by observing the differences
>>
>>
m:* lilypond-user
> *On Behalf Of *Paolo Prete
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 18, 2019 3:30 PM
> *To:* Aaron Hill
> *Cc:* lilypond-user
> *Subject:* Re: Need help with Scheme code
>
>
>
> Thanks again.
>
> Now, from what I see, I can extract if #mus is a Beam
>
Jaap
From: lilypond-user On
Behalf Of Paolo Prete
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2019 3:30 PM
To: Aaron Hill
Cc: lilypond-user
Subject: Re: Need help with Scheme code
Thanks again.
Now, from what I see, I can extract if #mus is a Beam with (ly:music-property
mus 'name) --> B
Thanks again.
Now, from what I see, I can extract if #mus is a Beam
with (ly:music-property mus 'name) --> BeamEvent
After that, how can I set, inside the same function you wrote, a variable
with the beam-thickness value of the corresponding Beam?
something like (pseudo code): (set! myVar curre
On 2019-12-17 6:01 pm, Paolo Prete wrote:
And thanks again to the Scheme-master Aaron.
I appreciate the kind words, though I doubt my experience rises to the
level of "master".
One last thing:
how can I arrange that function so to obtain output-attributes =
output-attributes + id ?
For ex
And thanks again to the Scheme-master Aaron.
One last thing:
how can I arrange that function so to obtain output-attributes =
output-attributes + id ?
For example: if output-attributes is (('a' . 'aa') ('i' . 'ii')) it must
become:(('a' . 'aa') ('i' . 'ii') ('id' . 'foobar_1'))
On Wed,
On 2019-12-17 4:21 pm, Paolo Prete wrote:
Hi Stefano,
unfortunately, it doesn't increment the counter globally, and the two
ids
in the SVG file are identical
You will need to define a music function so that the (serial) procedure
is called on each occurrence. Here's an option that rolls in
Hi Kieren,
yes, of course! please let me know how to use it
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 1:32 AM Kieren MacMillan <
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> > The ids must be: foobar_1, foobar_2 etc.
>
> Can they be foobar.1, foobar.2, etc. instead?
> Lilypond has a nice built-in mechan
Hi Paolo,
> The ids must be: foobar_1, foobar_2 etc.
Can they be foobar.1, foobar.2, etc. instead?
Lilypond has a nice built-in mechanism for that naming/pointer convention.
Hope that helps!
Kieren.
Kieren MacMillan, composer (he/him/his)
‣ website: www.kierenm
Hi Stefano,
unfortunately, it doesn't increment the counter globally, and the two ids
in the SVG file are identical
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 12:12 AM Stefano Troncaro
wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> After some googling and tweaking I managed to make the counter you wished:
>
> \version "2.19.83"
>
> #(de
Hi Paolo,
After some googling and tweaking I managed to make the counter you wished:
\version "2.19.83"
#(define* (make-counter #:optional (cnt 0) (inc 1))
(lambda ()
(set! cnt (+ cnt inc))
cnt))
#(define serial (make-counter))
token = -\tweak output-attributes #`((id . ,(string-a
In addition, Stefano, If you have time, please try the snippet for tuning
the beams (second attachment). Any test of these things are very helpful
for me.
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 11:18 PM Stefano Troncaro
wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> Look at this:
>
> \version "2.19.83"
>
> token = -\tweak output-attr
Thanks Stefano!
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 11:18 PM Stefano Troncaro
wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> Look at this:
>
> \version "2.19.83"
>
> token = -\tweak output-attributes #'((id . "foobar")) \etc
>
> \relative { c'4 d8 -\token [ e ] f2 }
>
> That achieves half of what you want. Now, how to make "foobar
Hi Paolo,
Look at this:
\version "2.19.83"
token = -\tweak output-attributes #'((id . "foobar")) \etc
\relative { c'4 d8 -\token [ e ] f2 }
That achieves half of what you want. Now, how to make "foobar"
automatically increment I don't know, perhaps someone else can help with
that.
Hope that h
Hello all,
In order to automate the reverse process of the lilypond+javascript
snippets (write the GUI modifications of the grobs to the .ly file) I need
to make the following code work:
%
token = \tweak output-attributes #'((id . "foobar"))
\score
{
{
a8 \token
although
#(define (bar m) etc
gave me some weird problems with \bar "" etc
>> #(define (baz m)
sorted it
On 26 Mar 2011, at 14:30, Damian leGassick wrote:
> Thanks Mike that works perfectly
>
> Damian
>
>
> On 26 Mar 2011, at 13:26, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
>
>> On Mar 26, 2011, at
Thanks Mike that works perfectly
Damian
On 26 Mar 2011, at 13:26, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
> On Mar 26, 2011, at 8:58 AM, Damian leGassick wrote:
>
>> hi all
>>
>> as you can see below I've got some very repetitive note entry
>>
>> my attempt at a scheme substitution is not working
>>
>
On Mar 26, 2011, at 8:58 AM, Damian leGassick wrote:
> hi all
>
> as you can see below I've got some very repetitive note entry
>
> my attempt at a scheme substitution is not working
>
> can anyone help me out here?
>
> cheers
>
> Damian
>
>
> \version "2.13.54"
>
> xenAccGliss = #(define-
hi all
as you can see below I've got some very repetitive note entry
my attempt at a scheme substitution is not working
can anyone help me out here?
cheers
Damian
\version "2.13.54"
xenAccGliss = #(define-music-function (parser location nOne nTwo) (ly:music?
ly:music?) #{
[\code]
I searched google, the forum and the manual, but I didn't find any hint...
the question is: can I add midi output to this function? if yes.. how?
Thanks in andvance for any help!
regards
bainos
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/help-wi
31 matches
Mail list logo
