Re: Issue a key change in Scheme syntax

2018-04-04 Thread Thomas Morley
2018-04-04 17:08 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : > Urs Liska writes: > It's confusing for experienced users but > not for beginners. > > It's designed to work as expected, for completely unrealistic > expectations. > >> Arrgh. > > You got that right. > > -- > David

Re: Issue a key change in Scheme syntax

2018-04-04 Thread David Kastrup
Urs Liska writes: > Am 04.04.2018 um 13:17 schrieb David Kastrup: [...] >>> Is it possible to write the Scheme function issuing the key change >>> with the pitch and the generic mode as input? >> (key-signature >> (key >> (get-meta-option base-path

Re: Issue a key change in Scheme syntax

2018-04-04 Thread Urs Liska
Am 04.04.2018 um 13:17 schrieb David Kastrup: Urs Liska writes: Hi, in my infrastructure I have a function that binds (key-signature #{ \key #(get-meta-option base-path 'key-tonic) #(get-meta-option base-path 'key-mode) #}) but I

Re: Issue a key change in Scheme syntax

2018-04-04 Thread David Kastrup
Urs Liska writes: > Hi, > > in my infrastructure I have a function that binds > > (key-signature > #{ >\key >#(get-meta-option base-path 'key-tonic) >#(get-meta-option base-path 'key-mode) > #}) > > but I would like to also change this to

Issue a key change in Scheme syntax

2018-04-04 Thread Urs Liska
Hi, in my infrastructure I have a function that binds (key-signature #{ \key #(get-meta-option base-path 'key-tonic) #(get-meta-option base-path 'key-mode) #}) but I would like to also change this to Scheme syntax (if it makes any sense after all). The first