2018-04-04 17:08 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
> Urs Liska writes:
> It's confusing for experienced users but
> not for beginners.
>
> It's designed to work as expected, for completely unrealistic
> expectations.
>
>> Arrgh.
>
> You got that right.
>
> --
> David
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 04.04.2018 um 13:17 schrieb David Kastrup:
[...]
>>> Is it possible to write the Scheme function issuing the key change
>>> with the pitch and the generic mode as input?
>> (key-signature
>> (key
>> (get-meta-option base-path
Am 04.04.2018 um 13:17 schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska writes:
Hi,
in my infrastructure I have a function that binds
(key-signature
#{
\key
#(get-meta-option base-path 'key-tonic)
#(get-meta-option base-path 'key-mode)
#})
but I
Urs Liska writes:
> Hi,
>
> in my infrastructure I have a function that binds
>
> (key-signature
> #{
>\key
>#(get-meta-option base-path 'key-tonic)
>#(get-meta-option base-path 'key-mode)
> #})
>
> but I would like to also change this to
Hi,
in my infrastructure I have a function that binds
(key-signature
#{
\key
#(get-meta-option base-path 'key-tonic)
#(get-meta-option base-path 'key-mode)
#})
but I would like to also change this to Scheme syntax (if it makes any
sense after all).
The first