Re: Leading Barline with Staff Size Increase

2012-02-19 Thread Xavier Scheuer
On 18 February 2012 11:51, Phil Holmes wrote: > > I remember this coming up before, and the answer is that there is a variable > that makes start bar lines disappear when they're below a certain size. > Can't remember the details, but it must be in the archive somewhere! Right, thank you Phil! I

Re: Leading Barline with Staff Size Increase

2012-02-18 Thread Mark Mathias
rom: "Phil Holmes" > To: "Xavier Scheuer" ; "Mark Mathias" < > markpmath...@gmail.com> > Cc: > Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2012 10:51 AM > > Subject: Re: Leading Barline with Staff Size Increase > > > - Original Message ----- From: "

Re: Leading Barline with Staff Size Increase

2012-02-18 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "Phil Holmes" To: "Xavier Scheuer" ; "Mark Mathias" Cc: Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2012 10:51 AM Subject: Re: Leading Barline with Staff Size Increase - Original Message - From: "Xavier Scheuer"

Re: Leading Barline with Staff Size Increase

2012-02-18 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "Xavier Scheuer" To: "Mark Mathias" Cc: Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2012 10:19 AM Subject: Re: Leading Barline with Staff Size Increase On 18 February 2012 04:31, Mark Mathias wrote: Greetings List, This is my first post. Hope I&

Re: Leading Barline with Staff Size Increase

2012-02-18 Thread Xavier Scheuer
On 18 February 2012 04:31, Mark Mathias wrote: > Greetings List, > This is my first post. Hope I've followed protocol. Yep, welcome. > If I follow the suggestion for increasing staff and symbol size, a leading > bar line appears. I have tried a number of experiments to get rid of it, > only to r