Am 9. Mai 2015 22:55:32 MESZ, schrieb David Bellows davebell...@gmail.com:
Sorry about not contacting you sooner!
It's perfectly OK! I'm sure I'm just way over-thinking the issue!
I'm more than happy to let you use the auto-ottava code for your
project. By posting it on this forum I make it
Am 09.05.2015 um 23:06 schrieb David Bellows:
I'm not sure so this maybe wrong. But AFAIK copyright for content posted to the
list is by default with the author and has no license by itself. So I think you
can't assume it's PD.
This sounds correct as well. Does just making the code available
Am 10.05.2015 um 00:00 schrieb David Bellows:
Basically, if you want to be legal and you want to use some code you saw on the
list, you need to get the author's permission. Hopefully, he put that
permission in the post, otherwise you need to contact him. That said, the
chances of anyone
Hello all,
I have a big coding project that generates Lilypond files to be
processed by Lilypond in an external process. My software is GPL. I
make use of a couple of scripts that were produced on this list but
have not been uploaded to the LSR. They are significant enough that I
would consider
Sorry about not contacting you sooner!
It's perfectly OK! I'm sure I'm just way over-thinking the issue!
I'm more than happy to let you use the auto-ottava code for your project.
By posting it on this forum I make it available to anybody who sees utility
in it.
I think that probably
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org wrote:
Am 09.05.2015 um 23:06 schrieb David Bellows:
I'm not sure so this maybe wrong. But AFAIK copyright for content posted
to the list is by default with the author and has no license by itself. So
I think you can't assume
Hi David.
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 3:17 PM, David Bellows davebell...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
I have a big coding project that generates Lilypond files to be
processed by Lilypond in an external process. My software is GPL. I
make use of a couple of scripts that were produced on this list
On 09/05/2015 22:06, David Bellows wrote:
I'm not sure so this maybe wrong. But AFAIK copyright for content posted to the
list is by default with the author and has no license by itself. So I think you
can't assume it's PD.
This sounds correct as well. Does just making the code available to
Yes. I'm happy to license this under the GPL.
In that case if you could add the following notice (substituting your
name, etc) to the top of the attached auto-ottava file then I think
we'd have it:
one line to give the program's name and a brief idea of what it does.
Copyright (C) year
I'm not sure so this maybe wrong. But AFAIK copyright for content posted to
the list is by default with the author and has no license by itself. So I
think you can't assume it's PD.
This sounds correct as well. Does just making the code available to
the world in a public manner imply
Basically, if you want to be legal and you want to use some code you saw on
the list, you need to get the author's permission. Hopefully, he put that
permission in the post, otherwise you need to contact him. That said, the
chances of anyone complaining are minimal, and in most
11 matches
Mail list logo
