Am Di., 11. Dez. 2018 um 13:56 Uhr schrieb David Sumbler :
> This may well be the answer I need for my full score. But now that you
> have introduced me to "strict-note-spacing" etc., I am again wondering
> whether there might perhaps be a way of getting Lilypond to make 2
> separate
-Original Message-
From: David Sumbler
Reply-To: da...@aeolia.co.uk
To: Thomas Morley
CC: lilypond-user
Subject: Re: Line-breaking with non-aligned barlines - again!
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 22:58:58 +
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Morley
To: David Sumbler
CC: lilypond
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Morley
To: David Sumbler
CC: lilypond-user
Subject: Re: Line-breaking with non-aligned barlines - again!
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 22:00:51 +0100
Am Mo., 10. Dez. 2018 um 18:25 Uhr schrieb David Sumbler <
da...@aeolia.co.uk>:
>
> To recap:
&g
Am Mo., 10. Dez. 2018 um 18:25 Uhr schrieb David Sumbler :
>
> To recap:
>
>3 days ago I wrote (with this subject line) that I have a passage to
>set where one instrument (harpsichord) plays 8 bars in 4/4 time,
>consisting mainly of semiquavers (sixteenths). It has to be played
>
To recap:
3 days ago I wrote (with this subject line) that I have a passage to
set where one instrument (harpsichord) plays 8 bars in 4/4 time,
consisting mainly of semiquavers (sixteenths). It has to be played
in strict time at its own tempo (4 = 108), which is quicker than the
-Original Message-
From: Mark Stephen Mrotek
To: da...@aeolia.co.uk, lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: RE: Line-breaking with non-aligned barlines - again!
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 10:17:43 -0800
David,
How about marking the part "ad libitum?"
Or perhaps making it bar-less as in
ypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Line-breaking with non-aligned barlines - again!
A few weeks back I wrote asking about a problem with a passage where one
instrument is playing at a different speed from the rest, and with barlines
that do not align with those in the other instruments.
Now I have a simil
A few weeks back I wrote asking about a problem with a passage where
one instrument is playing at a different speed from the rest, and with
barlines that do not align with those in the other instruments.
Now I have a similar passage, but it has thrown up another difficulty,
which I can't so far
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Morley
To: David Sumbler
CC: lilypond-user
Subject: Re: Line-breaking with non-aligned barlines
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 22:25:42 +0100
Am Mo., 29. Okt. 2018 um 12:10 Uhr schrieb David Sumbler <
da...@aeolia.co.uk>:
>
>
> -O
Am Mo., 29. Okt. 2018 um 12:10 Uhr schrieb David Sumbler :
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Morley
> To: David Sumbler
> CC: lilypond-user
> Subject: Re: Line-breaking with non-aligned barlines
> Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2018 02:01:04 +0200
>
> Am Fr., 26.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Morley
To: David Sumbler
CC: lilypond-user
Subject: Re: Line-breaking with non-aligned barlines
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2018 02:01:04 +0200
Am Fr., 26. Okt. 2018 um 23:52 Uhr schrieb David Sumbler <
da...@aeolia.co.uk>:
> But as things are the b
Am Mo., 29. Okt. 2018 um 07:58 Uhr schrieb Werner LEMBERG :
>
>
> >> If possible, this should be made the default. I even suggest to
> >> completely drop the current behaviour since I can't envision a
> >> situation where you really want this.
> >
> > I'll open an issue on the tracker.
>
>
>> If possible, this should be made the default. I even suggest to
>> completely drop the current behaviour since I can't envision a
>> situation where you really want this.
>
> I'll open an issue on the tracker.
Thanks.
> As workaround a much more elaborated coding below.
Excellent! I
Am So., 28. Okt. 2018 um 08:07 Uhr schrieb Werner LEMBERG :
>
> > A minimal would be:
> >
> > \paper { indent = 0 ragged-right = ##t }
> >
> > {
> > \override Beam.breakable = ##t
> > s2. s8
> > c'8[
> > \break
> > c'16]
> > }
> >
> > Not sure I'd call it a bug.
>
> IMHO, it is
> A minimal would be:
>
> \paper { indent = 0 ragged-right = ##t }
>
> {
> \override Beam.breakable = ##t
> s2. s8
> c'8[
> \break
> c'16]
> }
>
> Not sure I'd call it a bug.
IMHO, it is a bug.
> But I'd love to have a method to change this behaviour easily,
> currently
Am Fr., 26. Okt. 2018 um 23:52 Uhr schrieb David Sumbler :
> But as things are the break here is still unsatisfactory
> because the semiquaver just after the break has 2 long beams stretching
> back to the start of the line, whereas one would ideally want 1 long
> beam and a short one. I
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Morley
To: David Sumbler
CC: lilypond-user
Subject: Re: Line-breaking with non-aligned barlines
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 18:56:15 +0200
> Hi,
>
> you likely know lily breaks only at matching BarLines.
> So you have to insert a \bar "
Am Fr., 26. Okt. 2018 um 18:56 Uhr schrieb Thomas Morley
:
> << e { s1*15/320 \bar "" \ctxMom s } >>
Well, could be shortened to s1*3/64 and the \ctxMom-command should be
deleted after the duration is found, ofcourse.
Cheers,
Harm
___
Am Fr., 26. Okt. 2018 um 18:26 Uhr schrieb David Sumbler :
>
> Below I have shown a compile-able 93 lines (sorry it can't be made much
> shorter) from the files for a much longer piece.
>
> In this particular passage the harpsichord plays 4 bars in strict tempo
> whilst the flute plays 4 bars
- Original Message -
From: "David Sumbler"
To:
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2018 4:57 PM
Subject: Line-breaking with non-aligned barlines
Below I have shown a compile-able 93 lines (sorry it can't be made much
shorter) from the files for a much longer piece.
In your exampl
Below I have shown a compile-able 93 lines (sorry it can't be made much
shorter) from the files for a much longer piece.
In this particular passage the harpsichord plays 4 bars in strict tempo
whilst the flute plays 4 bars rubato. (The 2 lines do not fit and are
meant to sound terrible
21 matches
Mail list logo
