Hi,
I’m trying to convert a large choral project to 2.19. When I compile with
2.19, melismas don't work at all. For example:
c'4 \melisma d' e' \melismaEnd f
puts a note on every syllable.
I made a MWE which works perfectly. Diffs between the old and new files
have no changes except for the \ve
Hi Vaughan,
On 27.08.19 04:40, Vaughan McAlley wrote:
Hi,
I’m trying to convert a large choral project to 2.19. When I compile
with 2.19, melismas don't work at all. For example:
c'4 \melisma d' e' \melismaEnd f
puts a note on every syllable.
I made a MWE which works perfectly. Diffs betwe
Am 27.08.19 um 04:40 schrieb Vaughan McAlley:
I’m trying to convert a large choral project to 2.19. When I compile
with 2.19, melismas don't work at all. For example:
c'4 \melisma d' e' \melismaEnd f
puts a note on every syllable.
[…]
Does this ring a bell with anyone?
Yes, it does. Th
Am 27.08.19 um 10:56 schrieb Malte Meyn:
Yes, it does. The following two scores look the same in 2.18.2 and
different in 2.19.83:
This changed somewhere between 2.19.13 and 2.19.14. Without testing it
looks like commit df3457d8 “Allow \addlyrics to work with arbitrary
contexts” could be the r
Hey all,
This bit me way back when. Here’s the fix (note the \new Voice):
\version "2.19.83"
global = {
s1
\bar "|."
}
sop = \relative {
c'4( d) e f
}
soptext = \lyricmode {
Me -- lis -- ma
}
\new Staff \new Voice << \global \sop >> \addlyrics \soptext
\new Staff \new Voice << \global \s
Hi David,
> I'm not sure that it does.
Did you compile my example?
The melisma shows correctly in both staves, where it doesn’t in the original
MWE.
Isn’t that what needed fixing?
Confused,
Kieren.
Kieren MacMillan, composer (he/him)
‣ website: www.kierenmacmil
On Tue 27 Aug 2019 at 08:32:30 (-0400), Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> This bit me way back when. Here’s the fix (note the \new Voice):
>
> \version "2.19.83"
>
> global = {
> s1
> \bar "|."
> }
>
> sop = \relative {
> c'4( d) e f
> }
>
> soptext = \lyricmode {
> Me -- lis -- ma
>
On Tue 27 Aug 2019 at 11:16:00 (-0400), Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> > I'm not sure that it does.
>
> Did you compile my example?
> The melisma shows correctly in both staves, where it doesn’t in the original
> MWE.
> Isn’t that what needed fixing?
>
> Confused,
Yes, but I'm not sur
Hi David,
> Just to make it clear—my reply was aimed at Malte's MWE
> and not at the OP who hasn't yet shown us what their problem is.
Ah, okay. =)
I was just noting (for the OP) that a whole bunch of my scores with lyrics
"stopped working" early in the 2.19s, and adding \new Voice before the
On Wed, 28 Aug 2019, 02:22 Kieren MacMillan
wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> > Just to make it clear—my reply was aimed at Malte's MWE
> > and not at the OP who hasn't yet shown us what their problem is.
>
> Ah, okay. =)
>
> I was just noting (for the OP) that a whole bunch of my scores with lyrics
> "sto
On Tue 27 Aug 2019 at 12:21:39 (-0400), Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> > Just to make it clear—my reply was aimed at Malte's MWE
> > and not at the OP who hasn't yet shown us what their problem is.
>
> Ah, okay. =)
>
> I was just noting (for the OP) that a whole bunch of my scores with
Hi David,
> you relied upon LP instantiating a Voice context outside the
> << >>, whereas it chose inside (attached). […]
> So I don't think it's a bug or a regression, but a side effect of a
> new feature, documented at the first bullet point on page 11 of
> 2.19.83 changes.
Exactly. =)
> I su
12 matches
Mail list logo