Hi Jeff,
> Just what I needed!
Glad to hear it.
> It'll be a lot of work, but I think I can see exactly what you mean.
> Basically, each system will have a LOT of staves, but most will be invisible,
> most of the time.
Precisely. It's my ultimate dream that Lilypond could do this staff-splitt
Just what I needed!
It'll be a lot of work, but I think I can see exactly what you mean. Basically,
each system will have a LOT of staves, but most will be invisible, most of the
time.
Wonderful. Thank you!
Jeff
jeff_epst...@yahoo.com
---
MY BOYS!!!
- http://brother
Hi Jeff,
> I think my question came across differently than I intended. What I
> want is NOT for LilyPond to programmatically determine the best
> layout for each system. Rather, *I* want to tell Lily Pond that,
Yes, that is "easy" (read: possible).
> (I'm thinking that each system could be a
Thank you for the helpful information, Kieren. I will look carefully at
the polyphony documentation.
I think my question came across differently than I intended. What I
want is NOT for LilyPond to programmatically determine the best
layout for each system. Rather, *I* want to tell Lily Pond tha
Hi Jeff,
> What I need to do, is to merge parts together, arbitrarily, differently within
> each "master staff" (each set of staves, on each new line on the
> printout...sorry, don't know the right terminology).
"System".
> And so on. This will condense the printout by a LOT, and it feels necess
I did NOT cross off the word "impressive" in my original post! I meant to
emphasize it with em-dashes. I don't understand the syntax here yet.
Also, here's the fixed link to the "after" picture:
http://jeffyepstein.com/posts/merge_parts_question/after.jpg
__
I have been playing with LilyPond on and off for a while now. I'm a programmer
and musician, so I feel like I have a head start. But it's--impressive--heavy
duty stuff. I'm still really doing only the basics with LilyPond.
Anyway, I arrange acapella music. I want to get away from arranging by penc
