Re: Moving just text, leaving articulations in place?

2018-04-19 Thread Karlin High
On 4/19/2018 3:34 PM, David Kastrup wrote: Correct me if I am wrong: I don't use Gmail. Attached PNG has an annotated screenshot from the Gmail web interface. -- Karlin High Missouri, USA ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://li

Re: Moving just text, leaving articulations in place?

2018-04-19 Thread Robert Hickman
> Correct me if I am wrong: I don't use Gmail. Gmail completely hides previous messages by default, you have to manually show them, which is not standard use or google would not hide it. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists

Re: Moving just text, leaving articulations in place?

2018-04-19 Thread David Kastrup
Robert Hickman writes: >> Also, the LilyPond mailing list rules frown on top-posting. Please >> use inline quoting instead. > > That is how gmail works by default, If you mean that it leaves you with the cursor at the start of the fully quoted material: sure, how else would it prepare you for i

Re: Moving just text, leaving articulations in place?

2018-04-19 Thread Robert Hickman
> As described in the Learning Manual, which has been suggested that you read, > \once applies to everything happening at that musical moment; \tweak applies > to only the object containing the \tweak. > > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/learning/tweaking-methods > > You really *shoul

Re: Moving just text, leaving articulations in place?

2018-04-19 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 4/19/18, 3:52 AM, "Robert Hickman" wrote: Thanks, as far as I can see lilyponds modification system is based on a stack based state machine, \override permanently changes that state while \tweak only changes it once. Where would you use \tweak vs \once as they appear to do t

Re: Moving just text, leaving articulations in place?

2018-04-19 Thread David Kastrup
Robert Hickman writes: > Thanks, as far as I can see lilyponds modification system is based on > a stack based state machine, \override permanently changes that state > while \tweak only changes it once. Where would you use \tweak vs \once > as they appear to do the same thing?

Re: Moving just text, leaving articulations in place?

2018-04-19 Thread Robert Hickman
Thanks, as far as I can see lilyponds modification system is based on a stack based state machine, \override permanently changes that state while \tweak only changes it once. Where would you use \tweak vs \once as they appear to do the same thing? On 19 April 2018 at 07:55, Mark Knoop wrote: > At

Re: Moving just text, leaving articulations in place?

2018-04-18 Thread Mark Knoop
At 17:38 on 18 Apr 2018, Robert Hickman wrote: >Tried using "\override TextScript.staff-padding" to move the text >annotations in the attached image up but it also moves the Larson >articulation symbols up as well. I want these to stay in the same >place and the text to move up a bit away from them

Re: Moving just text, leaving articulations in place?

2018-04-18 Thread Andrew Bernard
Hi Robert and Simon, I posted a code example here of how to recast the Larsen library as articulations, not markup. You can take it from there and convert the whole lot the same way. Andrew On 19 April 2018 at 08:25, Simon Albrecht wrote: > On 18.04.2018 18:38, Robert Hickman wrote: > >> Trie

Re: Moving just text, leaving articulations in place?

2018-04-18 Thread Robert Hickman
Is it possible to create a local context around just the text to move them up individually and 'fake it'? I only need these secondary annotations in this example so it woulden't be a problem overall. I don't want to resort to hand editing the image if I can at all avoid it. For instance if screen

Re: Moving just text, leaving articulations in place?

2018-04-18 Thread Simon Albrecht
On 18.04.2018 18:38, Robert Hickman wrote: Tried using "\override TextScript.staff-padding" to move the text annotations in the attached image up but it also moves the Larson articulation symbols up as well. I want these to stay in the same place and the text to move up a bit away from them. Is l

Moving just text, leaving articulations in place?

2018-04-18 Thread Robert Hickman
Tried using "\override TextScript.staff-padding" to move the text annotations in the attached image up but it also moves the Larson articulation symbols up as well. I want these to stay in the same place and the text to move up a bit away from them. Is lilypond treating the articulation symbols as