On 9/7/09 10:24 PM, "Brett Duncan" wrote:
> Andrew Tucker wrote:
>> m7.7+ does provide the desired results, though I believe it's because
>> lilypond uses only the last alteration of a particular note (ie. 7.9+.9-
>> will end up 7/b9 and lose the sharp nine). This behavior might change
>> (?),
Andrew Tucker wrote:
m7.7+ does provide the desired results, though I believe it's because
lilypond uses only the last alteration of a particular note (ie. 7.9+.9-
will end up 7/b9 and lose the sharp nine). This behavior might change
(?), if I remember the tenor of that discussion, so we probab
On Sep 7, 2009, at 7:09 PM, Tim McNamara wrote:
Andrew Tucker wrote:
In NR B.2 Common chord modifiers, I think the line with:
Minor-major seventh
Minor triad, major seventh
maj7.5-
-> should change to: maj7.3- (both text and chord)
Clearly maj7.5- is *not* a minor-major seventh chord so th
Andrew Tucker wrote:
In NR B.2 Common chord modifiers, I think the line with:
Minor-major seventh
Minor triad, major seventh
maj7.5-
-> should change to: maj7.3- (both text and chord)
Clearly maj7.5- is *not* a minor-major seventh chord so that's a good
catch.
The syntax that seems most l
In NR B.2 Common chord modifiers, I think the line with:
Minor-major seventh
Minor triad, major seventh
maj7.5-
<>
-> should change to: maj7.3- (both text and chord)
-Andrew Tucker
http://tuckerandrew.net___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@
