Graham Percival wrote:
On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 14:40:48 -0700
Patrick Horgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...muchly stuff elided...
Thanks, Graham, I laughed out loud in Pizza My Heart reading this until
people were staring at me in envy!
Patrick
___
Well, at least my personal source of knowledge and wisdom says so:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LaTeX
LaTeX (pronounced /ˈleɪtɛx/ or /ˈleɪtɛk/) is a document markup
language and document preparation system
This is a good description
click on document preparation system: it redirects to
On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 17:46:45 +0200
Valentin Villenave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/10/5 Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Do you honestly consider LaTeX to be a word processor?
Well, at least my personal source of knowledge and wisdom says so:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LaTeX
Well,
2008/10/6 Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Well, your personal source of knowledge and wisdom sucks.
Matter of generation: not everybody was lucky enough to live at the
glorious era of usenet, you know :-)
I recommend removing \markuplines from the @predef, and change the
final paragraph to
On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 14:40:48 -0700
Patrick Horgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that I've learned the most from the online conversations
between Graham and Valentin, and as a tribute to them, would like to
give what to some may seem an overly obvious interpretation of the
undercurrents in
On 10/6/08 10:12 AM, Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 14:40:48 -0700
Patrick Horgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Graham Percival wrote:On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 22:44:27 +0200
Also, what do you mean by using a specific syntax? (same paragraph)
Obviously a syntax
On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 22:44:27 +0200
Valentin Villenave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/10/3 Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Also consider whether you should use system instead of line.
Well, in this particular case the use of line was implied by line
break. I could change this into system
On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 22:44:27 +0200
Valentin Villenave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/10/3 Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Also consider whether you should use system instead of line.
Well, in this particular case the use of line was implied by line
break. I could change this into system
2008/10/3 Steven Padalino [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There seems to be a new notation for text that I can't find mention of
anywhere in the docs yet. ^ places text above the staff, _ places it
below the staff. Now there's -. What does that do? Based on the
examples given it looks like it also
This is really good, Valentin! The examples are very clear and easy to
understand. And although I've followed the thread on documentation
design, this was the first significant time I'd spent looking at docs in
the new design. It looks really nice. Thanks for all the work on
design, guys!
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 18:51:36 +0200
Valentin Villenave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to declare that I officially don't feel competetent enough to
find anything more on my own to improve the 1.8 section of the
Notation Reference, aka Text.
Be afraid. Be very afraid. :)
So, I definitely
2008/10/3 Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Be afraid. Be very afraid. :)
I am. Why do you think it took me eight months to complete this section? :-)
- inspirational headword only uses \italics. Boring. (yeah, I
know it fits the theme of Beethoven stuff, but since NR 2
doesn't always
Greetings everybody,
after six months of hard work (and a significant hair loss as far as
Graham is concerned :-)
I'd like to declare that I officially don't feel competetent enough to
find anything more on my own to improve the 1.8 section of the
Notation Reference, aka Text.
(and, yes, the
13 matches
Mail list logo
