Zenaan Harkness writes:
> On 10/5/12, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Werner LEMBERG writes:
>>
Have you read
http://lwn.net/Articles/514964/
>>>
>>> Not yet, thanks for that!
>>>
on Bradley Kuhn's
http://sfconservancy.org/
>>>
>>> Actually, I've already asked for ma
On 10/5/12, David Kastrup wrote:
> Werner LEMBERG writes:
>
>>> Have you read
>>>
>>>http://lwn.net/Articles/514964/
>>
>> Not yet, thanks for that!
>>
>>> on Bradley Kuhn's
>>>
>>>http://sfconservancy.org/
>>
>> Actually, I've already asked for making FreeType a conservancy member
>> som
Werner LEMBERG writes:
>> Have you read
>>
>>http://lwn.net/Articles/514964/
>
> Not yet, thanks for that!
>
>> on Bradley Kuhn's
>>
>>http://sfconservancy.org/
>
> Actually, I've already asked for making FreeType a conservancy member
> some months ago, and it seems to be a quite slow p
> Have you read
>
>http://lwn.net/Articles/514964/
Not yet, thanks for that!
> on Bradley Kuhn's
>
>http://sfconservancy.org/
Actually, I've already asked for making FreeType a conservancy member
some months ago, and it seems to be a quite slow process...
Maybe we should do the same
Werner LEMBERG writes:
>> I'm getting "crowd-funded" for my work on LilyPond,
>
> Another new thing: https://www.gittip.com
Have you read
http://lwn.net/Articles/514964/
on Bradley Kuhn's
http://sfconservancy.org/
Jan
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance
Werner LEMBERG writes:
>> I'm getting "crowd-funded" for my work on LilyPond,
>
> Another new thing: https://www.gittip.com
Have you read
http://lwn.net/Articles/514964/
on Bradley Kuhn's
http://sfconservancy.org/
Jan
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance
David Kastrup writes:
> Werner LEMBERG writes:
>
>>> I'm getting "crowd-funded" for my work on LilyPond,
>>
>> Another new thing: https://www.gittip.com
>
> https://github.com/whit537/www.gittip.com/issues/126>
>
> I am not convinced a crowd-funding service that has still to find a
> solution fo
Werner LEMBERG writes:
>> I'm getting "crowd-funded" for my work on LilyPond,
>
> Another new thing: https://www.gittip.com
https://github.com/whit537/www.gittip.com/issues/126>
I am not convinced a crowd-funding service that has still to find a
solution for making actual payouts is the way to
> I'm getting "crowd-funded" for my work on LilyPond,
Another new thing: https://www.gittip.com
Werner
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
James writes:
> Hello,
>
> On 5 October 2012 02:08, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>> Any estimates of the number of "active" users of lilypond? We could
>> arrange feature fundings, with many users, say $20 each makes it
>> eminently feasible - kickstarter for lilypond.. but kickstarter
>> results in I
Hello,
On 5 October 2012 02:08, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> Any estimates of the number of "active" users of lilypond? We could
> arrange feature fundings, with many users, say $20 each makes it
> eminently feasible - kickstarter for lilypond.. but kickstarter
> results in I think in 10% or so lost
Any estimates of the number of "active" users of lilypond? We could
arrange feature fundings, with many users, say $20 each makes it
eminently feasible - kickstarter for lilypond.. but kickstarter
results in I think in 10% or so lost to the middle men, but it could
suffice. I'd be happy to pay stra
I thought of a solution.
This is not a quick task eventough I know what needs to be done, since such an
editor, only more advanced, is Laborejo.
For simple purposes it will be easy to do but quickly you encounter
shortcomings and the display is unstatisfying again which is the point where
the
Francisco Vila wrote:
> I think that what you want does actually exist, and it is called a
> spreadsheet. They are commonly used for (or primarily intended for)
> numbers and formulae laid out in rows and columns, although people do
> use them for pretty everything from "I lost my dog" ads to rest
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Nils Gey wrote:
> I thought of a solution.
> [...]
> Summary: It is totally possible, but I can't do it right now.
So, 50 bucks will have to wait :)
I'm actually surprised that noone pledged any additional bounty...
Janek
_
Francisco Vila writes:
> 2012/10/3 Janek Warchoł :
>> Imagine a piece for medium-sized orchestra (10 instruments, 200
>> measures). In LilyPond code, you have to write the instruments
>> separately from each other - the connection between them is not
>> visible. It is difficult to visualise how
I think MTX was doing that (or PMX?). I used it and would counsel to
try it there. If you find it usefull, why not?
Personally, I am happy with writing down on paper and transcribing
then (when the music becomes to complicated form my poor coding
habits).
Francois
2012/10/3, David Kastrup :
> Urs
This is not a quick task eventough I know what needs to be done, since such an
editor, only more advanced, is Laborejo.
For simple purposes it will be easy to do but quickly you encounter
shortcomings and the display is unstatisfying again which is the point where
the code need extensions and r
2012/10/3 Janek Warchoł :
> Imagine a piece for medium-sized orchestra (10 instruments, 200
> measures). In LilyPond code, you have to write the instruments
> separately from each other - the connection between them is not
> visible. It is difficult to visualise how they blend by looking at
> the
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 03.10.2012 10:12, schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Urs Liska writes:
>>
>>> Am 03.10.2012 07:34, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
Hi,
sorry for delay...
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:03 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Janek Warchoł writes:
>> Disabling automatic l
Am 03.10.2012 10:12, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska writes:
Am 03.10.2012 07:34, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
Hi,
sorry for delay...
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:03 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
Janek Warchoł writes:
Disabling automatic line wrapping and using horizontal scrolling
is the key :)
Of
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 03.10.2012 07:34, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
>> Hi,
>>
>> sorry for delay...
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:03 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> Janek Warchoł writes:
Disabling automatic line wrapping and using horizontal scrolling
is the key :)
Of course, it would
Am 03.10.2012 07:34, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
Hi,
sorry for delay...
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:03 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
Janek Warchoł writes:
Disabling automatic line wrapping and using horizontal scrolling is the key :)
Of course, it wouldn't probably make sense to *store* music in this f
Hi,
sorry for delay...
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:03 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Janek Warchoł writes:
>> Disabling automatic line wrapping and using horizontal scrolling is the key
>> :)
>> Of course, it wouldn't probably make sense to *store* music in this format.
>
> If you don't want to stor
On 27/09/12 01:41, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2012/9/26 Urs Liska :
>> Am 26.09.2012 14:03, schrieb David Kastrup:
>>> To me it sounds more like what you'd want here is several windows into
>>> the same file with synchronized cursor motion for things happening at
>>> the same musical time.
>>>
>> Oh y
Francisco Vila writes:
> 2012/9/26 Urs Liska :
>> Am 26.09.2012 14:03, schrieb David Kastrup:
>>> To me it sounds more like what you'd want here is several windows into
>>> the same file with synchronized cursor motion for things happening at
>>> the same musical time.
>>>
>> Oh yeah, that's some
2012/9/26 Urs Liska :
> Am 26.09.2012 14:03, schrieb David Kastrup:
>> To me it sounds more like what you'd want here is several windows into
>> the same file with synchronized cursor motion for things happening at
>> the same musical time.
>>
> Oh yeah, that's something I'd second.
> In an ideal w
2012/9/26 Christ van Willegen :
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Wim van Dommelen wrote:
>> TexShop does this (partly) for you: 2 windows can be open on one and the
>> same file, updates in one window are immediately live in the other.
>
> Vim can do that with as many windows as you'd like...
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Wim van Dommelen wrote:
> TexShop does this (partly) for you: 2 windows can be open on one and the
> same file, updates in one window are immediately live in the other.
Vim can do that with as many windows as you'd like...
Christ van Willegen
--
09 F9 11 02 9D 7
On 26 Sep 2012, at 14:06 , Urs Liska wrote:
Oh yeah, that's something I'd second.
In an ideal world these windows wouldn't only go into the same file
but into the same piece of music.
TexShop does this (partly) for you: 2 windows can be open on one and
the same file, updates in one window
Urs Liska writes:
> But I think this would be quite complex, because the editor would have
> to know the musical moment we are at. Which seems complicated from the
> beginning, but if we start to (re-)use variables ...
Seems like point-and-click Midi would deliver most of the required
informatio
Am 26.09.2012 14:03, schrieb David Kastrup:
Janek Warchoł writes:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Mats Bengtsson
wrote:
On 09/26/2012 12:48 PM, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
What about editors like Frescobaldi having the ability to convert
"regular lilypond" to "horizontal scroll" a
Janek Warchoł writes:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Mats Bengtsson
> wrote:
>>
>> On 09/26/2012 12:48 PM, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
>>>
>>> What about editors like Frescobaldi having the ability to convert
>>> "regular lilypond" to "horizontal scroll" and back? E.g. the code
>>>
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Mats Bengtsson
wrote:
>
> On 09/26/2012 12:48 PM, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
>>
>> What about editors like Frescobaldi having the ability to convert
>> "regular lilypond" to "horizontal scroll" and back? E.g. the code
>> above would be displayed as (view
Am 26.09.2012 13:53, schrieb Mats Bengtsson:
On 09/26/2012 12:48 PM, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
What about editors like Frescobaldi having the ability to convert
"regular lilypond" to "horizontal scroll" and back? E.g. the code
above would be displayed as (view using monospace font):
On 09/26/2012 12:48 PM, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
What about editors like Frescobaldi having the ability to convert
"regular lilypond" to "horizontal scroll" and back? E.g. the code
above would be displayed as (view using monospace font):
<<
{ a4 b c d e f g a ea g
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Nils Gey wrote:
> I have to see if Frescobaldi has an internal representation of durations
> and time signatures/bar length, but I guess not. This way the conversion
> from parallel back to sequential is a bit tricky since you need to keep track
> of the current
Nils Gey writes:
> I have to see if Frescobaldi has an internal representation of
> durations and time signatures/bar length, but I guess not.
Really? I know Emacs has it since it complains when you place bar
checks at the "wrong" point of time. Frescobaldi, judging from its
description, appea
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 10:53:23 +0200
Janek Warchoł wrote:
> Hi,
>
> one of the things that i find inconvenient in reading Lily syntax is
> its sequential nature. For example,
>
> <<
> {
> a4 b c d
> e f g a
> e a g f
> }
> {
> e4 a g f
> c2 e
> d8 c f4 d2
> }
>
Hi,
one of the things that i find inconvenient in reading Lily syntax is
its sequential nature. For example,
<<
{
a4 b c d
e f g a
e a g f
}
{
e4 a g f
c2 e
d8 c f4 d2
}
>>
it's hard to read the harmonies from the code, because voices are separate.
I know abou
40 matches
Mail list logo
