Re: Persistent font problems

2002-10-29 Thread Mats Bengtsson
> > /home/russell/docs/music/examples/feta-nummer10.600pk > > /var/lib/texmf/pk/bjtzzs/feta-nummer8.720pk > > /var/lib/texmf/pk/cx/feta-nummer8.300pk > > You have pk files for three different resolutions on your disk. You > state that you're running Red Hat 7.3, but this is (hopefully) not a > co

Re: Persistent font problems

2002-10-29 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Russell Smiley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I also tried 'ly2dvi -p' to output pdf. This appears to fix the problem > as you suggested. Good. > The only much more minor (cosmetic) complaint is that > the bracket for the piano staff appears to be the wrong size. Strange. > I've attached the ou

Re: Persistent font problems

2002-10-28 Thread Russell Smiley
I've attached the output of 'locate feta'. I also tried 'ly2dvi -p' to output pdf. This appears to fix the problem as you suggested. The only much more minor (cosmetic) complaint is that the bracket for the piano staff appears to be the wrong size. I think I can live with that. :-) Thanks for yo

Re: Persistent font problems

2002-10-26 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I hope you saw the other postings on this problem which I think answer > your question. > > Any ideas? Still the only thing I can think of is some kind of resolution mismatch. (are you sure you removed everything, i.e. what does locate feta say?) Second, if you use ly2

Re: Persistent font problems

2002-10-26 Thread Russell Smiley
I hope you saw the other postings on this problem which I think answer your question. Any ideas? Russell. On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 17:03, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > > > Does this happen on the Xdvi screen or in the PS? What happens if you > try ly2dvi --pdf and view the result with gv ? > > (It

Re: Persistent font problems

2002-10-26 Thread Russell Smiley
Mats, Removing the feta* files in my local directory made the dvips and ly2dvi generated files look the same. Unfortunately it didn't fix the squashed font problem. Sorry about the 16 versus 20 font size oversight. I'm usnig denemo to enter the music which defaults to 16 so I have to change it by

Re: Persistent font problems

2002-10-25 Thread Mats Bengtsson
> dvipslist: > kdebug:search(feta-nummer8.vf) => > kdebug:search(feta-nummer8.720pk) => ./feta-nummer8.720pk > kdebug:search(feta16.vf) => > kdebug:search(feta16.720pk) => ./feta16.720pk > kdebug:search(feta-braces4.vf) => > kdebug:search(feta-braces4.720pk) => ./feta-braces4.720pk Simply remove

Re: Persistent font problems

2002-10-25 Thread Russell Smiley
I've attached the dvipslist and xdvilist. They appear to have different lists of fonts in them. I also printed the dvips generated file and it looks just like it does in gv (completely messed up). Russell. On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 02:58, Mats Bengtsson wrote: > Try the following: > > export KPATH

Re: Persistent font problems

2002-10-25 Thread Mats Bengtsson
> You're correct. I just did a clean font. I viewed my example with xdvi > and tried "kpsewhich feta20.pk" again. No response again. Strange. > However I did notice that there is no font problem with xdvi (and the > rests are okay, they have also been a problem)...see the attached png. That's a

Re: Persistent font problems

2002-10-24 Thread Russell Smiley
You're correct. I just did a clean font. I viewed my example with xdvi and tried "kpsewhich feta20.pk" again. No response again. However I did notice that there is no font problem with xdvi (and the rests are okay, they have also been a problem)...see the attached png. > xdvi -v xdvi version 22.0

Persistent font problems

2002-10-24 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Hi, > > I have this font problem which existed in 1.4.x and appears to persist > in the 1.6.5 redhat rpm. I have run the buildscripts/clean-font.sh and > it appears to not make any difference. > > Can anyone suggest any further efforts to eliminate the problem? > > I'

Re: Persistent font problems

2002-10-24 Thread Mats Bengtsson
> Jan, > > I'm running Redhat 7.3 with standard kernel and appropriate updates. I > first saw the problem on Redhat 7.1 or 7.2. > > > mf --version > Metafont (Web2C 7.3.1) 2.7182 > kpathsea version 3.3.1 Same as on my machine! > > rpm -q tetex > tetex-1.0.7-47 > > rpm -q glibc > glibc-2.2.5-34

Re: Persistent font problems

2002-10-24 Thread Russell Smiley
Jan, I'm running Redhat 7.3 with standard kernel and appropriate updates. I first saw the problem on Redhat 7.1 or 7.2. > mf --version Metafont (Web2C 7.3.1) 2.7182 kpathsea version 3.3.1 > rpm -q tetex tetex-1.0.7-47 > rpm -q glibc glibc-2.2.5-34 Here's the responses to the kpsewhich you sugge

Re: Persistent font problems

2002-10-24 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Russell Smiley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have this font problem which existed in 1.4.x and appears to persist > in the 1.6.5 redhat rpm. I have run the buildscripts/clean-font.sh and > it appears to not make any difference. > You can see the 3 on the time signature is squashed. This > also

Persistent font problems

2002-10-23 Thread Russell Smiley
Hi, I have this font problem which existed in 1.4.x and appears to persist in the 1.6.5 redhat rpm. I have run the buildscripts/clean-font.sh and it appears to not make any difference. Can anyone suggest any further efforts to eliminate the problem? I've attached a png illustrating the problem (