On 6/18/09 8:45 AM, Laura Conrad lcon...@laymusic.org wrote:
Carl == Carl D Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
Carl Does this seem at all promising?
Yes, but there's still the problem of extra space at the barline. I
tried Michael's solutions and doing nothing at all and there's
Carl == Carl D Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
Carl Does this seem at all promising?
Yes, but there's still the problem of extra space at the barline. I
tried Michael's solutions and doing nothing at all and there's still
extra space after the 4th whole note.
Laura == Laura Conrad lcon...@laymusic.org writes:
Carl How about this?
Carl \relative c'' {
Carl \key f \major
Carl \cadenzaOn
Carl g1*1/4 bes1*1/4 a1*1/4 g1*1/4 g1.*1/6 c4 bes4 c1*1/4
Carl }
Carl I think that gets rid of the extra space.
Laura Yes, it does.
On 6/8/09 6:15 PM, Laura Conrad lcon...@laymusic.org wrote:
Carl == Carl D Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
Carl Here's my attempt to get the spacing you're looking for. I've
Carl done it manually, but if you like it, I think that I can write
Carl a music function
Op dinsdag 26 mei 2009, schreef Henning Plumeyer:
I would like to have a more dense horizontal spacing in the 3/1 sections
(where the music normally is pretty fast) than in the 2/2 sections.
You could place a \newSpacingSection command at the start of a section where
the average length of the
Am 29.05.2009, 08:10 Uhr, schrieb Wilbert Berendsen lily...@xs4all.nl:
Op dinsdag 26 mei 2009, schreef Henning Plumeyer:
I would like to have a more dense horizontal spacing in the 3/1 sections
(where the music normally is pretty fast) than in the 2/2 sections.
You could place a
Patrick McCarty wrote Monday, May 25, 2009 11:43 PM
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 03:26:42PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Trevor Daniels
t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote:
The lines in the html version of this section of the
Notation Reference are significantly
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 07:51:22AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Patrick McCarty wrote Monday, May 25, 2009 11:43 PM
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 03:26:42PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Trevor Daniels
t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote:
The lines in the html
Patrick McCarty wrote Tuesday, May 26, 2009 8:24 AM
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 07:51:22AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Patrick McCarty wrote Monday, May 25, 2009 11:43 PM
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 03:26:42PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Trevor Daniels
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:41:17AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Patrick McCarty wrote Tuesday, May 26, 2009 8:24 AM
I created a fresh patch and manually removed all of the trailing
whitespace from it, except for the one in the texidoc which I fixed.
Let me know if this one works.
'Fraid
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 04:15:51AM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:41:17AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
When I edit files from git I make sure there are no trailing spaces
by setting my editor to remove them automatically.
I have no idea what to do.
I find it
Am 25.05.2009, 02:13 Uhr, schrieb Carl D. Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu:
Here's my attempt to get the spacing you're looking for. I've done it
manually, but if you like it, I think that I can write a music function
\petrucciSpacing{} that will generate it automatically.
What I've done is to
Henning Plumeyer wrote:
\relative c'' {
\key f \major g1*1/4 bes1*1/4 a1*1/4 g1*1/4 d'1.*1/6 c4 bes4 c1*1/4
}
Hi, Carl,
could you explain why this works? I would have expected that g1*1/4 is
exactly the same as g4, but it is obviously not.
It looks like a whole note but has the duration of
On 5/25/09 10:57 AM, Henning Plumeyer h.plume...@web.de wrote:
Am 25.05.2009, 02:13 Uhr, schrieb Carl D. Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu:
There are some issues though - not with Laura's example where no bar lines
are needed. But when you want bar lines the bars are too full.
You can
Mats Bengtsson wrote Monday, May 25, 2009 8:03 PM
Henning Plumeyer wrote:
\relative c'' {
\key f \major g1*1/4 bes1*1/4 a1*1/4 g1*1/4 d'1.*1/6 c4 bes4
c1*1/4
}
Hi, Carl,
could you explain why this works? I would have expected that
g1*1/4 is
exactly the same as g4, but it is
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote:
Mats Bengtsson wrote Monday, May 25, 2009 8:03 PM
Henning Plumeyer wrote:
\relative c'' {
\key f \major g1*1/4 bes1*1/4 a1*1/4 g1*1/4 d'1.*1/6 c4 bes4 c1*1/4
}
Hi, Carl,
could you explain why this works? I
Am 25.05.2009, 23:23 Uhr, schrieb Carl D. Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu:
On 5/25/09 10:57 AM, Henning Plumeyer h.plume...@web.de wrote:
Am 25.05.2009, 02:13 Uhr, schrieb Carl D. Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu:
There are some issues though - not with Laura's example where no bar
lines
are
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 03:26:42PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote:
It looks like a whole note but has the duration of a quarter note, when
LilyPond determines the spacing. If you don't want to add *1/4 for every
On 5/25/09 4:43 PM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 03:26:42PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk
wrote:
It looks like a whole note but has the duration of a quarter note, when
LilyPond
2009/5/26, Carl D. Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu:
I tried to apply your patch, but I got the following:
It must not be anything wrong with the patch itself, It applies
perfectly on my machine.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org
___
Michael == Michael Lauer mrlau...@yahoo.com writes:
Michael Laura Conrad lconrad at laymusic.org writes:
But when I transcribe Petrucci from the facsimile, the spacing lilypond
does always looks clunky, especially in the parts with large
note-values.
I
On 5/24/09 8:56 AM, Laura Conrad lcon...@laymusic.org wrote:
I think so. There's a lot of stuff where modern transcribers typically
halve or even quarter the note values, and I'd prefer not to but it's
problematic with the normal lilypond spacing. (One reason it probably
became common
Laura Conrad lconrad at laymusic.org writes:
But when I transcribe Petrucci from the facsimile, the spacing lilypond
does always looks clunky, especially in the parts with large
note-values.
I believe Petrucci's spacing is just equal spacing for every note, no
matter what its value.
In general, I love the way lilypond output looks when compared with
other computer-generated sheetmusic.
I'm aware that the ideal espoused by the developers is the 19th century
hand-engraved sheet music.
I usually like the look of my lilypond output as compared with the late
sixteenth and early
24 matches
Mail list logo
