2014-04-24 9:37 GMT+02:00 Federico Bruni :
Hi Federico,
> I may do it today but I'm not sure about the version I have. For example,
> my file is 424 lines long, no line 437 and no typo... Last change on my
> file system is 8 December. See file attached.
>
It's shorter because older. Harm wrot
Am 24.04.2014 09:58, schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider:
2014-04-24 0:48 GMT+02:00 Urs Liska:
Hi Urs,
So where is now the latest and most complete version of LilyJAZZ?
>We would still like to make it accessible through the openLilyLib snippets
>repo, just beside the SMuFL/Bravura "adaptor"
>
ASAP
I meant to send a pull request, but I forgot to do it.
I may do it today but I'm not sure about the version I have. For example,
my file is 424 lines long, no line 437 and no typo... Last change on my
file system is 8 December. See file attached.
This is the place waiting for the files:
https
2014-04-24 0:34 GMT+02:00 Schneidy :
> Thomas Morley-2 wrote
>> Additionally LillyJAZZ.ily was updated with all recent improvements.
>
> Hi Harm,
>
> Sorry to come that late into this discussion (I've just moved to v2.18
> LilyJAZZ few minutes ago).
> Just to say that there is a typo line 437 :
> \
So where is now the latest and most complete version of LilyJAZZ?
We would still like to make it accessible through the openLilyLib snippets
repo, just beside the SMuFL/Bravura "adaptor"
Urs
Schneidy schrieb am 23.04.2014:
>Thomas Morley-2 wrote
>> Additionally LillyJAZZ.ily was updated with al
Thomas Morley-2 wrote
> Additionally LillyJAZZ.ily was updated with all recent improvements.
Hi Harm,
Sorry to come that late into this discussion (I've just moved to v2.18
LilyJAZZ few minutes ago).
Just to say that there is a typo line 437 :
\revert Staff.KeyCancellation #'stenci(l)
Cheers,
~
Am 10.12.2013 07:19, schrieb Urs Liska:
Am 10.12.2013 00:49, schrieb Janek Warcho?:
2013/12/8 David Kastrup:
"Shall be" does not state when. It's certainly not a replacement for a
formal submission. If someone finds a way to get hold of the author and
get him to place the thing in some public
Am 10.12.2013 00:49, schrieb Janek Warcho?:
2013/12/8 David Kastrup :
"Shall be" does not state when. It's certainly not a replacement for a
formal submission. If someone finds a way to get hold of the author and
get him to place the thing in some public place with a clear license
statement, i
2013/12/8 David Kastrup :
> "Shall be" does not state when. It's certainly not a replacement for a
> formal submission. If someone finds a way to get hold of the author and
> get him to place the thing in some public place with a clear license
> statement, it would not get lost in case he becomes
Curt writes:
> In his initial announcement, he wrote, "At any rate, the whole
> LilyJAZZ issue shall be open and free (just like Lilypond)..."
>
> Is that not enough?
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2013-03/msg00647.html
"Shall be" does not state when. It's certainly not a r
In his initial announcement, he wrote, "At any rate, the whole LilyJAZZ issue
shall be open and free (just like Lilypond)..."
Is that not enough?
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2013-03/msg00647.html
Curt
On Dec 8, 2013, at 5:05 AM, Federico Bruni wrote:
> 2013/11/25 Urs Lisk
2013/11/25 Urs Liska
> I have to add that some opinions were raised that we can't simply put
> something in such a library that was 'published' on lilypond-user without
> asking back with the author - who seems to be unreachable for LilyJAZZ.
>
in the archives I've found his web.de address
I sen
2013/12/2 Federico Bruni
> 2013/12/2 David Kastrup
>
>> Wouldn't it make sense to integrate the bend stuff into LilyPond? That
>> would make it easier to match versions and behavior.
>>
>
> I think that it would be great.
> I've never used it much because of version conflicts and because I hope
2013/12/2 David Kastrup :
> Thomas Morley writes:
>> it's because grace-notes are beamed per default with 2.17.96.
>> Change the example to
>> \bendGrace { \preBendRelease c8( \noBeam d)( } c2) r2
>>
>> or better the definition of 'preBendRelease' to
>
> Wouldn't it make sense to integrate the ben
2013/12/2 David Kastrup
> Wouldn't it make sense to integrate the bend stuff into LilyPond? That
> would make it easier to match versions and behavior.
>
I think that it would be great.
I've never used it much because of version conflicts and because I hoped
that 1196 would have been solved soo
Thomas Morley writes:
> 2013/11/26 Federico Bruni :
>
>> If Marc or Harm are reading this message, I've just compiled bendtest.ly
>> with 2.17.96 and there's a problem in measure 10: a beam appears and I get
>> this warning:
>>
>> Drawing systems...
>>
>> bendtest.ly: warning: no viable initial c
Hi,
2013/12/2 Thomas Morley :
> 2013/11/26 Federico Bruni :
>
>> If Marc or Harm are reading this message, I've just compiled bendtest.ly
>> with 2.17.96 and there's a problem in measure 10: a beam appears and I get
>> this warning:
>>
>> Drawing systems...
>>
>> bendtest.ly: warning: no viable in
2013/11/26 Federico Bruni :
> If Marc or Harm are reading this message, I've just compiled bendtest.ly
> with 2.17.96 and there's a problem in measure 10: a beam appears and I get
> this warning:
>
> Drawing systems...
>
> bendtest.ly: warning: no viable initial configuration found: may not find
>
2013/11/26 Federico Bruni :
> 2013/11/25 Janek Warchoł
>>
>> If you'd like to help with getting bend stuff and LilyJAZZ into
>> openlilylib/snippets that would be absolutely awesome! We accept pull
>> requests on github, or you could send us patches. If you don't feel
>> comfortable with such wo
2013/11/25 Janek Warchoł
> If you'd like to help with getting bend stuff and LilyJAZZ into
>
openlilylib/snippets that would be absolutely awesome! We accept pull
> requests on github, or you could send us patches. If you don't feel
> comfortable with such workflows, It would be enough if you j
Am 25.11.2013 00:11, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
2013/11/24 Federico Bruni :
2013/10/9 Urs Liska
I followed this thread only loosely.
As long as we can't directly include LilyJAZZ into LilyPond I suggest
making it available (and improvable) here:
https://github.com/openlilylib/snippets/tree/master/
2013/11/24 Federico Bruni :
> 2013/10/9 Urs Liska
>> I followed this thread only loosely.
>> As long as we can't directly include LilyJAZZ into LilyPond I suggest
>> making it available (and improvable) here:
>> https://github.com/openlilylib/snippets/tree/master/LilyJAZZ
>> I just created a folde
2013/10/9 Urs Liska
> I followed this thread only loosely.
> As long as we can't directly include LilyJAZZ into LilyPond I suggest
> making it available (and improvable) here:
> https://github.com/openlilylib/snippets/tree/master/LilyJAZZ
> I just created a folder where all related stuff can be p
Am 10.10.2013 11:34, schrieb Urs Liska:
...
OK, it's fixed now and extended by the other predicates:
https://github.com/openlilylib/snippets/blob/master/general-tools/lilypond-version-predicates.ily
Sorry, wrong link.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
Thanks Harm for the report and Marc for the suggestion.
Actually when reading your first email I had already noticed and fixed
the issue.
I'm somewhat frustrated how this could have happened. Originally I typed
that function correctly and I would have sworn someone has modified it
afterwards.
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 01:40:06AM +0200, Thomas Morley wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> this is another font and simply installing the font doesn't changes
> accidentals in chords with alterations.
True, I intentionally showed LilyPond's standard chordname
formatting.
I customize the look of my chord symbol
Am 10.10.2013 08:10, schrieb Martin Tarenskeen:
On Wed, 9 Oct 2013, Tim McNamara wrote:
Thanks for having a bash at that. As a matter of taste, I think I
prefer not having the font's sharps and flats used in the chord names
because they look disproportionately large compared to the text,
whe
Am 10.10.2013 01:56, schrieb Thomas Morley:
2013/10/9 Urs Liska :
[...]
One more thing which might be useful for the technical issues you are
talking about:
I started a snippet to switch program execution based on the used LilyPond
version
https://github.com/openlilylib/snippets/blob/master/spe
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
Maybe it could even be possible to design a music font that improves the
reading skills for people who have always had trouble to read music.
Something comparable to that special text font that was designed for people
with dyslexia: http://www.st
On Wed, 9 Oct 2013, Tim McNamara wrote:
Thanks for having a bash at that. As a matter of taste, I think I
prefer not having the font's sharps and flats used in the chord names
because they look disproportionately large compared to the text, whereas
the default accidentals look fine to my ey
On Oct 9, 2013, at 6:40 PM, Thomas Morley wrote:
> 2013/10/9 Jim Long :
>> On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 12:53:35AM +0200, Thomas Morley wrote:
>>> 2013/10/9 Jim Long :
>>>
\override ChordName #'font-name = #"lilyjazzchord"
>>>
>>> Hi Jim,
>>>
>>> never heard of "lilyjazzchord".
>>> Where to
2013/10/9 Urs Liska :
[...]
>
> One more thing which might be useful for the technical issues you are
> talking about:
> I started a snippet to switch program execution based on the used LilyPond
> version
> https://github.com/openlilylib/snippets/blob/master/specific-solutions/lilypond-version-swi
Am 09.10.2013 01:07, schrieb Jim Long:
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 12:53:35AM +0200, Thomas Morley wrote:
2013/10/9 Jim Long :
\override ChordName #'font-name = #"lilyjazzchord"
Hi Jim,
never heard of "lilyjazzchord".
Where to get?
Compiling your snippet returns LilyPond-default for the Chor
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 12:53:35AM +0200, Thomas Morley wrote:
> 2013/10/9 Jim Long :
>
> > \override ChordName #'font-name = #"lilyjazzchord"
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> never heard of "lilyjazzchord".
> Where to get?
>
> Compiling your snippet returns LilyPond-default for the ChordNames.
>
> Cheers,
>
2013/10/9 Jim Long :
> \override ChordName #'font-name = #"lilyjazzchord"
Hi Jim,
never heard of "lilyjazzchord".
Where to get?
Compiling your snippet returns LilyPond-default for the ChordNames.
Cheers,
Harm
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilyp
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 09:46:45PM +, Steve Noland wrote:
>
> An additional question: can someone provide a snippet that shows how the
> LilyJAZZ fonts do with jazz chordnames?
\version "2.17.26"
\include "LilyJAZZ.ily"
globalMusic = {
\time 4/4
\key a \minor
} % globalMusic
harmonies
36 matches
Mail list logo
